Assignment Help- Total Marks PUBH6206: Health Promotion and Community Health Assessment 2: Develop a Health Promotion Plan Individual
ASSESSMENT 2 BRIEF
Subject Code and Title
Assessment
Individual/Group
Length
Learning Outcomes
Submission
Weighting
Total Marks PUBH6206: Health Promotion and Community Health
Assessment 2: Develop a Health Promotion Plan
Individual
2000 words (+/-10%)
This assessment addresses the following learning outcomes:
a) Critically analyse health promotion principles theories at the level of prevention.
b) Apply the principles of the Ottawa Charter to develop health promotion interventions in diverse communities.
d) Apply health promotion principles, theoretical frameworks, and strategies to health promotion intervention for diverse communities. e) Critically analyse the concepts of community capacity building and empowerment within health promotion interventions
Assessment Due: Sunday of week 9 at 11:55pm AEST/AEDT
40%
100 marks
Context
Public Health promotion programs are designed to improve the health of their target community. Effective public health promotion programs are the cornerstone to good population health. The success of these programs depends upon multiple factors, such as, understanding the target community, assessing the needs of that community, and applying the knowledge for needs assessment of the given community. These skills are essential for public health professionals to develop effective and sustainable programs for in their chosen field. This assessment will give student the opportunity to plan a health promotion program in an area of their interest by applying their knowledge of community public health, community engagement and application of health promotion theories and frameworks.
Task Summary
Students are required to write the health promotion program plan of 2000 words (+/- 10%) in length. Students are required to follow the instructions on how to develop their plan. You will be provided with a list of communities and health issues by your Learning Facilitator. You can choose one of health issue and ne community to develop a specific health promotion plan. Support your point of view with the credible evidence sources.
Instructions
1. Choose one community and one selected health issue from the list provided by your Learning Facilitator.
2. Identify the social determinants of selected health issue in the chosen community (such as age, gender, culture, lifestyle, socioeconomic status), the burden of disease and the significant impacts on health of the chosen community.
3. Assess the community needs based on identified social determinant of health within the context of the chosencommunity and selected non-communicable disease.
4. Use the assessment 2 template to develop your health promotion plan.
5. Propose a health promotion program plan to be implemented in the chosen community to addressthe selected health issues. You are required to apply theory and conceptual framework of health promotion at an appropriate level(s)- primary, secondary or tertiary level.
6. Develop health promotion plan by applying one or more of the Ottawa Charter strategies as a framework for your program based on the needs and context of the chosencommunity.
7. You are required to explain the stages of program development, use the assessment 2 template to develop your health promotion plan
8. Explain how your program will be monitoring and evaluated by using the template.
9. Critically explain timeframe and milestones of your program by using a Gantt chart provided in the assessment 2 template
10. Provide at least 10 references to support your assignment and using APA 7th edition referencing style
Format parameters
• Use the given template for assessment 2
• Include a title page that states:
• Your health promotion program title (provide the specific title of your program);
• Your first and last name;
• Your student identification number;
• Word count (excluding the reference list);
• The subject name;
• Your lecturer/learning facilitator; and
• An academic integrity declaration
• In relation to formatting, ensure that your paper uses:
• APA 7th version referencing style; Page numbers;
• 1.5 spacing;
• Font style: Arial, Tahoma
• A font size of 11-points minimum
Figures and tables
All figures and tables added in the assignment should be relevant and be discussed in the text body. Any figures and tables derived from other works must be presented with citation using APA 7th style
Submission Instructions
Submit this task via the Assessment task 2 link in the Assessment area in PUBH6206: Health Promotion and Community Health. The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via theGrade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades.
Academic Integrity Declaration Individual assessment tasks:
I declare that except where I have referenced, the work I am submitting for this assessment task is my ownwork. I have read and am aware of Torrens University Australia Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure viewable online at http://www.torrens.edu.au/policies-and-forms
I am aware that I need to keep a copy of all submitted material and their drafts, and I will do so accordingly.
Assessment 2 Marking Rubric
Assessment
Attributes Fail
(Yet to achieve minimum standard)
0–49% Pass
(Functiona
l)
50– 64% Credit
(Proficient)
65–74% Distinction
(Advanced)
75–84% High Distinction
(Exceptional)
85–100%
Understanding community health, community needs and importance of the particular health promotion program to address health issues in the target community.
5% Health issues and community needs
Unable to discuss particular health issues in the target community or identify community needs. Only general information is described. Particular health issues in the target community and community needs are discuss but overly descriptive and lacks justification. Particular health issues in the target community and community needs are discussed with adequate justification but not always in a logical way. Particular health issues in the target community and community needs are critically discussed with good justification. Particular health issues in the target community and community needs are critically discussed with excellent justification.
5% Key determinants of health
Unable to identify key Identify 2-3 key Identify 4-5 key determinants Identify 5 key determinants identify more 5 key 5 key
20% determinants of health determinants of health for of health for the particular of health for the particular determinants of health for the
for the particular health the particular health issue in health issue in the target health issue in the target particular health issue in the
issue in the target the target community. Its community. Its impacts on community. Its impacts on target community. Its impacts on
community. impacts on health outcomes health outcomes are provided health outcomes are health outcomes are provided
are provided with limited with adequate justification but provided with good with excellent justification.
justification. not always in a logical way. justification.
5% Relevant health indicators
Unable to identify health indicator to explain health status of target community. Identify 1-2 relevant health indicators to explain health status of target community, with Identify 2-3 relevant health indicators to explain health status of target community, with adequate justification but Identify 3 relevant health indicators to explain health status of target community, with good justification. Identify more than 3 relevant health indicators to explain health status of target community, with excellent
limited justification. not always in a logical way. justification.
5% Importance of health promotion program
Unable to critically discuss the importance of the proposed health promotion program in addressing health issues in the target community. The importance of the proposed health promotion program in addressing health issues in the target community is overly descriptive and lacks justification. The importance of the proposed health promotion program in addressing health issues in the target community is discussed with adequate justification but not always in a logical way. The importance of the proposed health promotion program in addressing health issues in the target community is critically discussed with good justification. The importance of the proposed health promotion program in addressing health issues in the target community is critically discussed with excellent justification and related to the community needs.
Apply health promotion conceptual framework and the Ottawa Charter strategies to develop a health promotion plan for a specific health issue in the target community.
30% 10% Conceptual framework and approach
Unable to apply an appropriate health promotion approach(s) to the proposed program. Only general information is described. An appropriate health promotion approach(s) is applied but overly descriptive with limited justification. An appropriate health promotion approach(s) is applied and discussed with adequate justification but not always in a logical way. An appropriate health promotion approach(s) is applied and critically discussed with good justification. An appropriate health promotion approach(s) is applied and critically discussed with excellent justification and related to community needs.
5% level of intervention
Unable to identify an appropriate level(s) of intervention. Only general information is described. An appropriate level(s) of intervention is identified but overly descriptive with limited justification. An appropriate level(s) of intervention is identified and discussed with adequate justification but not always in a logical way. An appropriate level(s) of intervention is identified and critically discussed with good justification. An appropriate level(s) of intervention is identified and critically discussed with excellent justification and related to community needs.
10% Ottawa Charter strategies
Unable to apply an appropriate Ottawa
Charter strategy(s) to the proposed program. Only general information is described. An appropriate Ottawa Charter strategies are applied but not all strategies are appropriate. It is overly descriptive with limited justification. An appropriate Ottawa
Charter strategies are applied and discussed with adequate justification but not always in a logical way. An appropriate Ottawa Charter strategies are applied and critically discussed with good justification. An appropriate Ottawa Charter strategies are applied and critically discussed with excellent justification and related to community needs.
5 % Setting of the program
No setting of the program is presented. A setting of the program is identified but not appropriate and overly descriptive with limited justification. An appropriate setting of the program is identified and discussed with adequate justification but not always in a logical way. An appropriate setting of the program is identified and critically discussed with good justification. An appropriate setting of the program is identified and critically discussed with excellent justification and related to community needs.
Critically explain the proposed health promotion plan with aims, objectives, time frame and evaluation
plan
40% 5% Aim(s) of the program
Unable to develop an appropriate aim for specific health promotion program. The aim of the program is developed but poorly aligned with conceptual framework and the Ottawa Charter strategies. The aim of the program is developed but aligned with only conceptual framework or the Ottawa Charter strategies. The aim of the program is well developed aligned with both conceptual framework and the Ottawa Charter strategies. The aim of the program is sophisticatedly developed aligned with both conceptual framework the Ottawa Charter strategies.
10% Objectives 1 explanation
Unable to develop objective for specific health promotion program.
No intervention is presented The objective is developed but poorly aligned with the aim, conceptual framework, level of intervention, and the Ottawa Charter strategies. Interventions are poorly explained in narrative and tabular forms with limited justification. The objective is developed and aligned with 2-3 key elements of the program (aim, conceptual framework, level of intervention and the Ottawa Charter strategies).
Interventions are explained in narrative and tabular forms with adequate justification but not always in a logical way. The objective is well developed and aligned with all key elements of the program. Interventions are explained in narrative and tabular forms with good justification. The objective is sophisticatedly developed and aligned with all key elements of the program. Interventions are critically explained in narrative and tabular forms with excellent justification and address community needs.
10% Objective 2 explanation
Unable to develop objective for specific health promotion program.
No intervention is presented The objective is developed but poorly aligned with the aim, conceptual framework, level of intervention, and the Ottawa Charter strategies. Interventions are poorly explained in narrative and tabular forms with limited justification. The objective is developed and aligned with 2-3 elements of the program (aim, conceptual framework, level of intervention and the Ottawa Charter strategies).
Interventions are explained in narrative and tabular forms with adequate justification but not always in a logical way. The objective is well developed and aligned with all elements of the program. Interventions are explained in narrative and tabular forms with good justification. The objective is sophisticatedly developed and aligned with all key elements of the program. Interventions are critically explained in narrative and tabular forms with excellent justification.
5% Time frame and Gantt chart
Unable to develop timeframe or Gantt chart for specific health promotion program. Thetimeframeisexplained with limitedjustificationandpoorly aligned with theprogramplan. Gantt Chart ispresented but poorly consistent withthe programplan. The timeframe is explained with adequate justification and aligned with the program plan. Gantt Chart is presented but not always consistent with the program plan. The timeframe is well explained with good justification and aligned with the program plan. Gantt Chart is presented consistently with the program plan. The timeframe is sophisticatedly explained with excellent justification and aligned with the program plan. Gantt Chart is well presented and consistent with the program plan.
10% Evaluation plan
Unable to develop evaluation plan that is relevant to objectives of the proposed health promotion program. The evaluation plan is developed for only one objective with limited justification and poorly aligned with the objective or intervention. Indicators of process and outcomes are identified but are poorly explained in narrative and tabular forms with limited justification. The evaluation plan is developed for both objectives with adequate justification and aligned with the objectives and interventions. Indicators of process and outcomes are identified and justified but not always relevant and often lacking in clarity. Details are presented in both narrative and tabular forms. The evaluation plan is well developed for both objectives with good justification and aligned with the objectives and interventions. Indicators of process and outcomes are well identified and justified. Details are presented clearly in both narrative and tabular forms. The evaluation plan is exceptionally developed for both objectives with excellent justification and aligned with the objectives and interventions. Indicators of process and outcomes are well identified and justified. Details are presented sophisticatedly in both narrative and tabular forms.
Assessment fulfils general academic standards and general criteria.
10% 5% Standard of academic writing
Poorly written with errors in spelling and grammar. Assessment template is not used. Written according to the academic standard. Uses the assessment template. Well-written and adheres to the academic standard. Uses the assessment template. Very well-written and adheres to the academic standard. Uses the assessment template. Expertly written, adheres to academic standards and uses the given assessment template.
5% Reference management
Provides less than 5 high- quality, credible, and relevant references. There are multiple mistakes in using APA style or incorrect referencing style used Provides 7-9 high-quality, credible, and relevant references. There are some mistakes in using APA style, either in- text or within the reference list. Provides at least 10 high- quality, credible, and relevant references. There are a few mistakes in using APA style, either in- text or within the reference list. Provides more than 10 high- quality, credible, and relevant references. Uses the APA style consistently and correctly, both in-text and in the reference list. Provides more than 12 high- quality, credible, and relevant references. Uses the APA style consistently and correctly, both in- text and in the reference list.
The following Subject Learning Outcomes are addressed in this assessment
SLO a) Critically analyse health promotion principles and theories at the level of prevention.
SLO b) Apply the principles of the Ottawa Charter to develop health promotion interventions in diverse communities
SLO d) Apply health promotion principles, theoretical frameworks, and strategies to health promotion intervention for diverse communities.
SLO e) Critically analyse the concepts of community capacity building and empowerment within health promotion interventions