Assignment Scenario : Financial Analysis of an Existing Company Your Role Assume you are the finance manager in an organisation, you have been directed by the finance director to make a presentation
MBA7060 Financial Management and Decision Making | |
Assessment Number | 1 |
Assessment Type (and weighting) | Oral Assessment (30% of final mark) |
Assessment Name | Presentation (20 Minutes) |
Assessment Submission Date | Assignment 1 - Oral Assessment – w/c 31st March 2025 ( upload deadline – 4th April 2025 |
Learning Outcomes Assessed:
Learning Outcomes |
LO2: Interpret, critically evaluate, and synthesise information and data from appropriate sources, and use these to make informed judgments in critical business areas. |
LO4: Communicate complex financial information and present arguments in a professional manner. |
Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) Applications in this Assessment
AI Status | Application | Notes |
Category A | No GAI tool is permitted. | While grammar and/or spell checkers may be used to correct individual words and sentences, the use of GAI is not allowed. This is because the learning outcomes require you to produce original assessment work without any GAI assistance Any GAI generated content which is presented as your own original work and is not acknowledged will be assessed for academic misconduct. |
Assignment Scenario : Financial Analysis of an Existing Company
Your Role
Assume you are the finance manager in an organisation, you have been directed by the finance director to make a presentation to a group of potential investors looking to invest in your organisation.
You are required to prepare a financial analysis using appropriate performance matrix and present your findings about the financial performance of the company on efficiency, liquidity, and profitability. You are required to use the information provided in the company’s annual accounts, including Market ratios to measure the market performance of the shares and dividend payments etc, of the organisation, evaluating it for the benefit of the potential investors, who will be invited to attend a short presentation provided by you. You have also been asked to critically assess the relevance of annual reports to stakeholders and any other additional internal management information that may help in financial analyses when speaking to potential investors.
Assignment Tasks:
You should select a company from the FTSE100 London stock market (Public limited company – Plc). You will need to obtain a copy of their most recent annual report/accounts, alongside any other internal management information which will help you analyse the company’s financial performance.
You must let your tutor know your chosen organisation. Prepare a presentation, based on the financial information in the annual report and internal management data. The presentation is to be made to an invited group of potential investors. The presentation will be for 20 minutes and will be followed by questions from the examiners.
You can consider the following in your structure:
- Structure of the Business including size, products, and governance
- Understanding financial analysis and its usefulness in organisations
- Implementation of relevant ratio analysis – calculation or extraction from annual report financial statements.
- Market ratios - Measuring the market performance of the company – calculating and interpreting share price, EPS, PE/ration & dividends payout, or cover.
- Relevance of annual reports in general to stakeholders.
- Any additional internal management information relevant to potential investors.
You may wish to consider any two of the following as additional internal management information.
- Strategic Plans and innovations and their benefits to potential investor
- Change Management Issues if any & how they were managed
- Global/International Competition and how they were managed.
- Global Market and economic Challenges and how they were managed etc.
Marking Criteria:
Background and structure of the company – 20%
Financial analysis of the company - 50%
Research & Presentation-15%
Q&A (from both student and examiner) – 15%
Important and helpful information
Please refer to the Module Guide for information regarding indicative reading, guidelines for the preparation and submission of assignments, and the assessment criteria.
Submission
Electronic copies of assignments should be submitted via “Turn-it-in” NO LATER THAN THE DEADLINE.
Please ensure you follow the instructions provided by your module tutor and on the assessment brief. Submission of assessments must be done by submission date. Assignments not available at this time will be considered late unless an extension has been previously agreed.
Students who fail to submit assessments by the specified date (without an extension being granted or without accepted Mitigating Circumstances) will be subject to the following penalties:
- Up to 7 calendar days late = 10 marks subtracted but if the assignment would normally gain a pass mark, then the final mark to be no lower than the pass mark for the assignment.
- More than 7 calendar days late = This will be counted as non-submission and no marks will be recorded.
Please note that it is your responsibility to ensure that the assignment is submitted in the format/s specified in the Module Guide or on the Assessment Brief.
YOU SHOULD ALWAYS ENSURE YOU KEEP A COPY OF ANY ASSIGNMENT SUBMITTED.
In the case of exceptional and unforeseen circumstances, an extension of up to 14 days after the assessment deadline may be granted. This must be agreed by your Programme Leader, following a discussion the Module Tutor. You should complete an Extension Request Form available from Student Services and attach documentary evidence of your circumstances, prior to the published submission deadline.
Extensions over 14 calendar days should be requested using the Mitigating Circumstances procedure.
Some students with registered disabilities will be eligible for revised submission deadlines. Revised submission deadlines do not require the completion extension request paperwork.
Please see the Programme Handbook for further details.
References
Level HE7 - It is expected that the Reference List will contain between fifteen to twenty-five sources. As a MINIMUM the Reference List should include four refereed academic journals and five academic books.
At the end of assignment presentation:
Declaration: At the end of the assessment you should also include a declaration of any software tools including Generative AI (GAI) applications that you used in developing and completing the assessment.
Ge Assessment Guidelines for Written Assessments Level HE7neral
|
| % | Relevance | Knowledge | Argument/Analysis | Structure | Presentation | Written English | Research/Referencing |
DISTINCTION |
| 85-100% | Almost all parts of the report are directly relevant to title/brief. The assumptions of the title and/or the requirement of the brief is expertly addressed in an exemplary manner.
| Exemplary knowledge of concepts, theory and practice is clearly demonstrated is all areas. The interpretation of appropriate concepts and theoretical models with insight is visible. There is exemplary display creativity in conceptual original thinking. | Work produced is exceptional in analysing essential research materials. An exemplary level of evaluation is made based on an excellent theoretical understanding of work discussed and clear evidence of independent, informed judgement is made. | An exemplary level of coherence and structure in framed the analysis. Work is articulated and logically structured and has shown complete compliant with recommended format.
| Exemplary presentational style and format commensurate with the nature of work. Excellent use of figures, tables, and plates (where required). | Exceptional level of language is used with no grammatical errors, excellent punctuation and usage of appropriate formal academic and industry language and terminology. | Harvard referencing has been applied correctly with no errors throughout the work for in text and end of text referencing. A large variety of current, varied, and suitable sources have been used. Recognition of different perspectives is acknowledged and applied.
|
Excellent Quality | 70-84% | Most parts of the report are directly relevant to title/brief. The assumptions of the title and/or the requirement of the brief is excellently addressed | Excellent knowledge of concepts, theory and practice is clearly demonstrated is all areas. The interpretation of appropriate concepts and theoretical models with insight is visible. There is excellent display of creativity in conceptual original thinking. | Work produced is excellent in analysing essential research materials. An excellent level of evaluation is made based on an excellent theoretical understanding of work discussed and clear evidence of independent, informed judgement being given. | An excellent level of coherence and structure in framing the analysis. Work is articulated and logically structured and has shown excellent level of compliant with recommended format. | Excellent presentational style and format, commensurate with the nature of work. Excellent use of figures, tables, and plates (where required). | Excellent level of English language is used with no grammatical errors. Excellent punctuation, usage of appropriate formal academic and industry language and terminology. |