BUS406 Developing Teams (J/507/1588) BUS406 Assignment Brief Qualification QUALIFI Level 4 Diploma in Business Management 601/6048/2 Unit Code BUS406 Unit Title Developing Teams Unit Reference J/507/1588 C

BUS406 Developing Teams (J/507/1588) BUS406 Assignment Brief Qualification QUALIFI Level 4 Diploma in Business Management 601/6048/2 Unit Code BUS406 Unit Title Developing Teams Unit Reference J/507/1588 Credits 20 TQT 200 GLH 80 Assignment Aim The unit focuses on building, developing and supporting teams to enable them to achieve their goals and objectives. Learners will identify the skills and potential of teams and individuals.

Opportunities for teams to develop, gaining new skills and experiences and ways to evaluate and improve their performance are important to the unit too.

Learning Outcomes And Assignment Criteria Learning Outcomes When awarded credit for this unit, a learner will:

Assessment Criteria Assessment of this learning outcome will require a learner to demonstrate that they can:

1. Analyse the characteristics of teams. 1.1 Identify the attributes of a successful team. 1.2 Review theoretical models and approaches used to evaluate teams.
2. Evaluate methods for team development. 2.1 Assess motivational factors affecting different teams. 2.2 Evaluate relevant theory.
3. Evaluate methods of setting team objectives, and monitoring and evaluating team performance. 3.1 Identify different approaches to setting team objectives and evaluating team performance. 3.2. Produce recommendations on how to improve team performance.

Scenario Corporate Office in Cairo, Egypt

You have recently been promoted to Team Leader in the Operations Department of a multinational company in Cairo. Your team consists of diverse members with varying experience levels. Your manager has tasked you with ensuring that your team is highly effective, motivated, and continuously improving its performance. You must analyze your team’s dynamics, apply relevant theories, set clear objectives, and recommend strategies for development and performance evaluation.

Task 1: Analyzing Team Characteristics LO1: Analyse the characteristics of teams

AC 1.1 Identify the attributes of a successful team. AC 1.2 Review theoretical models and approaches used to evaluate teams. Instructions :

Write a report (1,000 words) analyzing the key characteristics of a high-performing team. Apply team effectiveness models such as Belbin’s Team Roles, Tuckman’s Stages of Group Development, or Katzenbach & Smith’s Team Effectiveness Model. Provide real or hypothetical examples from your workplace scenario to illustrate your points. Conduct a peer evaluation where each team member provides feedback on their perceived role within the team. Evidence Required:

Written report (1,000 words). Peer evaluation feedback summary. Task 2: Evaluating Team Development Methods LO2: Evaluate methods for team development

AC 2.1 Assess motivational factors affecting different teams. AC 2.2 Evaluate relevant theory. Instructions:

Conduct a role-playing exercise where you act as a team leader addressing a team motivation challenge (e.g., low morale, resistance to change). Apply motivational theories such as Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs, Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory, or McClelland’s Theory of Needs to propose solutions. Evidence Required:

Written analysis (800 words) linking the role-play scenario to motivation theories. Task 3: Setting Objectives And Evaluating Performance LO3: Evaluate methods of setting team objectives, and monitoring and evaluating team performance

AC 3.1 Identify different approaches to setting team objectives and evaluating team performance. AC 3.2 Produce recommendations on how to improve team performance. Instructions:

Organize a performance review meeting role-play, where you (as the team leader) evaluate a team member’s performance and set future objectives. Write a report (1,000 words) comparing different approaches to performance management, such as SMART objectives, KPIs, and 360-degree feedback. Propose specific recommendations for improving team performance based on your workplace scenario. Evidence Required:

Written report (1,000 words).