Case Background: Tech Innovate Corporation is grappling with the following  knowledge management challenges: Silos of Information: Teams and departments are wor

Assessment Details for Assessment Item 1:

Overview

Case Study: Revolutionizing Knowledge Management at Tech Innovate Corporation Introduction:

Tech Innovate Corporation, aprominent technology company, is facing significant challenges in knowledge management, hindering innovation and growth. This case study explores the current state of knowledge management at Tech Innovate and proposes strategies to overcome these challenges.

 Case Background:

Tech Innovate Corporation is grappling with the following  knowledge management challenges:

Silos of Information:

Teams and departments are working in isolation, limiting the flow of knowledge across the organization.

Lack of Codification Standards:

Knowledge documentation lacks uniformity, making it challenging to retrieve and apply information efficiently.

Limited Knowledge Sharing Culture:

Employees are not actively participating in knowledge-sharing practices, impacting collaboration and innovation.

Technological Barriers:

Out dated technology hampers effective knowledge sharing and collaboration with in the organization.

Questions:

Silos of Information:

Question: How can Tech Innovate identify existing silos of information within the organization and encourage cross-functional knowledge sharing?

Lack of Codification Standards:

Question: What steps can Tech Innovate take to establish standardized codification practices for knowledge documentation, ensuring uniform adoption across the organization?

Limited Knowledge Sharing Culture:

Question: What initiatives can be implemented to foster a culture of knowledge sharing among employees at Tech Innovate?

Technological Barriers:

Question: Conduct an assessment of Tech Innovate's current technology infrastructure. What upgrades or new tools are recommended to enhance knowledge sharing?

Submission Instructions

All submissions are to be submitted through Turnitin. Drop-boxes linked to Turnitin will be setup in Moodle. Assessments not submitted through these drop-boxes will not be considered. Submissions must be made by the end of the session.

The Turnitin similarity score will be used to determine any plagiarism of your submitted assessment. Turnitin will check conference websites,  Journal articles, online resources, and your peer’s submissions for plagiarism. You can see your Turnitin similarity score when you submit our assessments to the appropriate drop-box. If your similarity score is of concern, you can change your assessment and resubmit. However, re- submission is only allowed before the submission due date and time. You cannot make re-submissions after the due date and time have elapsed.

Note: All work is due by the due date and time. Late submissions will be penalized at 20% of the assessment final grade per day, including weekends.

Marking Criteria/Rubric

You will be assessed on the following marking criteria/Rubric: