Case Presentation: Advanced Practice Clinical Reasoning and Professional Communication Purpose: The purpose of this assignment is to help you practice how advanced practice nurses analyze clinical conditions,
Case Presentation: Advanced Practice Clinical Reasoning and Professional Communication
Purpose:
The purpose of this assignment is to help you practice how advanced practice nurses analyze clinical conditions, apply evidence-based care, and communicate professionally. By preparing and recording a case presentation, you will strengthen your ability to clearly explain clinical reasoning, management decisions, and patient education strategies.
The peer review component allows you to engage in professional dialogue, reflect on your own work, and learn from the perspectives of your colleagues—skills essential for leadership and collaboration in advanced nursing practice.
Instructions:
Module 7 Assignment
Case Presentation: Recorded PowerPoint Presentation with Peer Review
Assignment Overview
In this assignment, you will develop and video record a professional PowerPoint presentation based on a clinical case encountered during your practice experience or a topic of interest that primarily affects the older adult population.
This assignment is designed to simulate how advanced practice nurses communicate clinical knowledge to professional peers. You will submit a PowerPoint presentation with speaker notes, a recorded oral presentation, and participate in a structured peer review process.
Assignment Objectives
By completing this assignment, you will demonstrate the ability to:
· Analyze a health condition commonly affecting older adults
· Apply advanced pathophysiologic and clinical reasoning to patient care
· Communicate evidence-based clinical information clearly and professionally
· Critically evaluate peer work and provide constructive, professional feedback
Topic Selection
Select one health problem that primarily affects the older adult population.
Suggested topics include (not limited to):
· Anemia of Chronic Disease
· Rheumatoid Arthritis
· Restless Legs Syndrome
· Hypertension
Required Presentation Content
Your presentation must include the following sections:
· Introduction to the Condition
o Overview of the disorder
o Relevance to the older adult population
· Epidemiology and Pathophysiology
o Incidence and prevalence
o Pathophysiology from the cellular to the system level
· Advanced Practice Assessment and Management
o Key assessment findings
o Diagnostic considerations and differential diagnoses
o Evidence-based treatment and management strategies
o Pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic interventions
o Genetics and genomics considerations, when applicable
· Patient Education and Holistic Care
o Patient education strategies
o Cultural considerations
o Spiritual considerations
· Conclusion and Practice Implications
o Key clinical takeaways for advanced practice nurses
Presentation Format Requirements
PowerPoint Presentation
· 10–15 slides (excluding title and reference slides)
· Slides should be clear, concise, and professionally formatted
Speaker Notes (Required)
· Speaker notes must be included on every content slide
· Notes must expand upon slide content and reflect what would be verbally presented
· Notes should demonstrate clinical reasoning and depth of understanding
· Bullet points alone are insufficient
Recorded Presentation (Required)
· Record yourself presenting the slides as if addressing a professional audience
· Audio narration is required; video is optional unless otherwise specified
· Recommended presentation length: 10–15 minutes
Scholarly Sources
· Include a minimum of four current scholarly sources published within the past five years
· Acceptable sources include peer-reviewed journal articles and primary legal sources, when applicable
· All citations and references must follow current American Psychological Association format
Peer Review Requirement
After submitting your presentation, you will complete two peer reviews as assigned in Canvas.
Each peer review must include:
· One specific strength of the presentation
· One area for improvement with supporting rationale
· One suggestion to enhance clarity, organization, or evidence-based practice
Peer feedback must be professional, respectful, and substantive. Brief or non-constructive comments will not receive full credit.
Initial Submission
· PowerPoint file with speaker notes
· Recorded presentation file or recording link
Peer Review Submission
· Completion of assigned peer reviews within the Canvas peer review tool
Module 7 Assignment Rubric
|
Criteria |
Ratings |
|
Criterion 1: Content Accuracy &
Depth (5 points) |
Exemplary Content is accurate, comprehensive,
and demonstrates advanced understanding of the condition. All required
elements are addressed with strong clinical relevance to older adults. 5 to >4 pts Proficient Content is accurate and complete
with minor gaps in depth or synthesis. 4 to >3 pts Developing Content is partially complete or
lacks sufficient depth in multiple areas. 3 to >1 pts Unsatisfactory Content is inaccurate, incomplete,
or missing major components. 1 to >0 pts |
|
Criterion 2: Evidence-Based Practice
& Scholarly Sources (4 points) |
Exemplary Integrates at least four current
scholarly sources effectively and links evidence to clinical decisions. 4 to >3 pts Proficient Required sources are used
appropriately with adequate integration. 3 to >2 pts Developing Fewer than required sources or
limited integration of evidence. 2 to >1 pts Unsatisfactory Minimal, inappropriate, or missing
scholarly sources. 1 to >0 pts |
|
Criterion 3: Speaker Notes Quality
(4 points) |
Exemplary Speaker notes are included on every
content slide and meaningfully expand upon slide content, demonstrating
strong clinical reasoning. 4 to >3 pts Proficient Speaker notes are present on most
slides and adequately expand on content. 3 to >2 pts Developing Speaker notes are minimal,
repetitive, or missing on multiple slides. 2 to >1 pts Unsatisfactory Speaker notes are largely absent or
insufficient. 1 to >0 pts |
|
Criterion 4: Recorded Presentation
Delivery (4 points) |
Exemplary Presentation is clear, professional,
well-paced, and demonstrates strong oral communication skills. 4 to >3 pts Proficient Presentation is understandable with
minor issues related to pacing or clarity. 3 to >2 pts Developing Presentation lacks organization,
clarity, or appropriate length. 2 to >1 pts Unsatisfactory Presentation is missing, incomplete,
or not recorded as required. 1 to >0 pts |
|
Criterion 5: Organization,
Professionalism & APA Format |
Exemplary Presentation is well organized,
professional, and follows current American Psychological Association format
with minimal or no errors. 3 to >2 pts Proficient Organization and formatting are
adequate with minor errors. 2 to >1 pts Developing Organization is inconsistent with
multiple formatting or citation errors. 1 to >0 pts Unsatisfactory Presentation lacks organization and
does not follow professional or citation standards. 0 pts |
|
Criterion 6: Peer Review
Participation & Quality (Bonus or Embedded) (2 points) |
Developing 1 pt: Peer reviews are minimal or
vague. 0 pts Exemplary 2 pts: Completes all peer reviews on
time with thoughtful, constructive, and professional feedback. 0 pts Proficient 1-1.5 pts: Peer reviews are
completed but lack depth or specificity. 0 pts Unsatisfactory 0 pts: Peer reviews are incomplete,
missing, or unprofessional. 0 pts |