Choose one of the theorist discussed in this module ( Environmental, Economic, or Theories of Organizational Behavior and Leadership), explain it and apply it in an example of the management of healthcare. Contri
Module 4: Nursing Theorists
Instructions:
· Choose one of the theorist discussed in this module ( Environmental, Economic, or Theories of Organizational Behavior and Leadership), explain it and apply it in an example of the management of healthcare.
Contribute a minimum of 4 pages (excluding title page and references page). It should include at least 3 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.
Be sure to review the academic expectations for your submission.
Official Assignment Rubric
|
- Official Assignment Rubric |
||
|
Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfessionalism Concept Application |
20 to >18.0 ptsExcellentThe student meets 90% to 100% of the
required content criteria by mastering both rudimentary and complex elements
and, in addition, applying high-level facts, theories, definitions, and other
contextual aspects. Lastly, all the delivered information is compliant with
the assignment instructions. 18 to >16.0 ptsGoodThe student meets 80% to 89% of the
required content criteria by recognizing the fundamental, rudimentary, and
complex elements and applying proficient facts, theories, definitions, and
other contextual aspects. Lastly, all the delivered information is compliant
with the assignment instructions. 16 to >14.0 ptsFairThe student meets 70% to 79% of the
required content criteria by recognizing rudimentary and complex elements and
demonstrating facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. All
of the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions. 14 to >12.0 ptsPoorThe student meets less than 70% of
the required content criteria with a low-level approach of rudimentary and
complex elements and a lack of application facts, theories, definitions, and
other contextual aspects. However, all the delivered information is compliant
with the assignment instructions. 12 to >0 ptsUnacceptableThe assignment did not reflect the
requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. |
20 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar Written Communication |
20 to >18.0 ptsExcellentExcellence in grammar, spelling, and
sentence structure. Sentences are not too long and are complete sentences. 18 to >16.0 ptsGoodMinimal (1 - 3) typos, spelling,
grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors 16 to >14.0 ptsFairMultiple (4 -7) typos, spelling,
grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. 14 to >12.0 ptsPoorSevere (8 - 10) typos, spelling,
grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. 12 to >0 ptsUnacceptableUnacceptable (11 or more) typos,
spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. |
20 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCommunication Specific Formatting |
20 to >18.0 ptsExcellentThe assignment meets 90 % - 100% of
the required formatting elements in the assignment description. Additionally,
the presented information is complete in all the required components and
exceeds expectations. 18 to >16.0 ptsGoodThe assignment meets 80% to 89% of
the required formatting elements in the assignment description. Additionally,
the presented information meets all the necessary components and formatting
requirements. 16 to >14.0 ptsFairThe assignment meets 70% to 79% of
the required formatting elements in the assignment description. However, the
presented information is missing some key details, but overall does not
disrupt the required format. 14 to >12.0 ptsPoorThe assignment meets at most 69% of
the required formatting elements in the description. The presented
information is missing some key details that disrupt the needed formatting. 12 to >0 ptsUnacceptableThe assignment did not reflect the
requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. |
20 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical and Logical Thinking Thought analysis process |
20 to >18.0 ptsExcellentThe assignment meets 90% to 100% of
rudimentary and complex details, situations, problems, and diagnosis
awareness that are accurate and correctly documented. In addition, the
analysis offers a clear and concise analysis along with an impeccable and
precise, well-thought process. 18 to >16.0 ptsGoodThe assignment meets 80% to 89% of
rudimentary and complex details, situations, problems, and diagnosis
awareness which are accurate and correctly documented. The analysis is well
communicated, and the fundamental thought process presented in the written
piece clearly aligns with the assignment expectations. 16 to >14.0 ptsFairThe assignment satisfies 70% to 79%
of rudimentary and complex details, situations, problems, or diagnosis
awareness but may overlook some essential parameters. The analysis and
thought process presented in the written piece is evident; however, still
developing. 14 to >12.0 ptsPoorThe assignment meets at most 69% of
rudimentary details, situations, problems, or diagnosis awareness, but there
was a severe overlook of some essential parameters. In addition, the analysis
and thought process presented in the written piece is not evident and not
founded on previous discussions or information. 12 to >0 ptsUnacceptableThe assignment did not reflect the
requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. |
20 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAcademic Literacy Quality of Sources and APA Citations |
20 to >18.0 ptsExcellentSupporting information is pertinent
to the topic, up to date (depending on what is acceptable in the field), from
credible and trusted sources, and the number of sources meets the requested
amount. Additionally, all sources are recognized or cited properly. 18 to >16.0 ptsGoodSupporting information is pertinent
to the topic, however, 1 source is not a credible and trusted source; they
may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the
field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount. The
essay offers correct formatting on the setup, and title page, with minimal
formatting or punctuation errors within the in-text citations or references. 16 to >14.0 ptsFairSupporting information is pertinent
to the topic, however, 2 or more sources are not credible and trusted
sources; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is
acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the
requested amount. The essay offers correct formatting, setup, and title page but
has significant errors within in-text citations and references. 14 to >12.0 ptsPoorThe following criteria would apply,
supporting information is not pertinent to the topic, none of the sources are
from credible or trusted sources, or the number of sources requested was not
met. The essay offers severe incorrect APA formatting, setup or missing title
page, and/or problematic in-text citations and references. 12 to >0 ptsUnacceptableThe assignment did not reflect the
requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. |
20 pts |
Total Points: 100
