CO 7: Critique social work theories for their applicability with diverse populations (Competency 6). CO 9: Choose social work theoretical and practice frameworks when assessin

Due Sunday by 11:59pm Points 150 Submitting a text entry box or a file upload Week 2Human Development Across the Lifespan Assignment Purpose The purpose of this assignment is to demonstrate understanding of human development across the lifespan by applying relevant social work theories to practice. This will be accomplished through a presentation of assessment concepts integrating theoretical frameworks for work with diverse populations and highlighting culturally responsive and developmentally appropriate approaches.

Course Outcomes This assignment provides documentation of student ability to meet the following course outcomes:

CO 7: Critique social work theories for their applicability with diverse populations (Competency 6). CO 9: Choose social work theoretical and practice frameworks when assessing individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities (Competency 7). Due Date Students must complete the Week 2 Assignment and upload the file to Canvas by Sunday at 11:59 p.m. MT.

Late Assignment Policy Students are expected to submit assignments by the due date. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive an automatic deduction. Please review the course syllabus regarding Chamberlain University’s late work policy.

Total Points Possible This assignment is worth 150 points.

Preparing the Assignment Follow these guidelines when completing each component of the assignment. Contact your course faculty if you have questions.

Directions

Using Newman and Newman’s (2018) chronological approach for describing human development across the lifespan (see also Chapter 2 in the Counselman Carpenter textbook), you will choose one or more stages for your assigned case and apply at least one classic human development theory and at least one critical or strengths- and asset-based approach discussed in Counselman-Carpenter's (2025) edited textbook. Follow these steps:

First, identify the life stage(s) you will review. Second, prepare and later upload a slide deck using Microsoft PowerPoint. You will record a 5- to 7-minute video presentation of the slide deck. This presentation will be used in next week’s class discussion. Organize your slide deck (PowerPoint presentation) using the title headings identified below. Stage. Identify the stage and any pertinent information from the case study. Classic Developmental Theory. Identify the theory being critiqued. Briefly discuss the theory, including its core concepts and propositions. Describe the relationship between concepts and what the theory suggests in terms of development. Applying a Critical Lens. Critique the theory based on its applicability and its relevance to your case study. Describe the potential impact of the theory on your case. Consider the use of critical or strengths- and asset-based theories as part of your critique. Critical Theory, Strengths-Based, or Asset-Based Theory (select only one). Identify one critical, strengths-based, or asset-based theory and discuss its relevance to your case study. Describe how it helps inform or understand your case study’s history, situation, and experience. Briefly discuss how this theory is different from classic human development theories. Questions for Assessment. What are three to five questions that align with the theory you chose for slide D that you would include in your initial assessment of your case study? Describe the rationale for asking the question and its connection to the theory. Please remember that you will use your slides for a video narration. Each slide text should not exceed 40 words. The slide should only highlight the key points. Use the speaker notes as your script where you answer the questions above. You will use this script for your presentation. Include at least three credible references. Include in-text citations. Upload the completed presentation to Canvas by Sunday at 11:59 p.m. MT. Once you complete the recording, please check the quality of the video to make sure the picture is clear and the sound is audible. You must upload the video file to My Media in Canvas. Links to online video-sharing platforms will not be accepted. Go to My Media in Canvas and click Media Upload. Drag and drop the file or choose the file to upload. All standard video formats (e.g., MP4) are accepted. This will save your video to Kaltura Media. When you are ready to submit your assignment, click “Start Assignment.” Next, click Text Entry. In the Rich Content Editor, click Embed Kaltura Media. Locate your video and click Embed. After you have embedded your video, click Submit Assignment.

Rubric MSW544_W2_Assignment RubricMSW544_W2_Assignment RubricCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStage and Classical Developmental Theory• Identified the developmental stage and succinctly described pertinent information from the case study. • Identified and briefly discussed the classic development theory. • Identified the core concepts and propositions (the relationship between concepts) and what the theory suggests in terms of development.25 ptsExcellentAll questions answered with depth.20 ptsSatisfactoryAll questions were answered but lacked specificity.13 ptsNeeds ImprovementAnswers were vague. The application of theory to practice was not made.0 ptsUnsatisfactoryNone of the questions were answered.25 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplying a Critical Lens• Critiqued the theory based on its applicability and its relevance to your case study. • Described the potential impact of the theory on your case. • Considered the use of critical or strengths-and-asset-based theories when critiquing it.30 ptsExcellentAll questions answered with depth. One or more critical, strengths-based, or asset-based theories were used to critique the classic development theory.24 ptsSatisfactoryAll questions were answered but lacked specificity. One or more critical, strengths-based, or asset-based theories were used to critique the classic development theory.15 ptsNeeds ImprovementAnswers were vague. The application of theory to practice was not made.0 ptsUnsatisfactoryNone of the questions were answered.30 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Theory, Strengths-Based, or Asset-Based Theory (select only one)• Identified one critical, strengths-based, or asset-based theory and discuss its relevance to your case study. • Described how it helps inform or understand your case study’s history, situation, and experience. • Described how it differs from classic human development theories.30 ptsExcellentAll questions answered with depth. One or more critical, strengths-based, or asset-based theories were used to critique the classic development theory.24 ptsSatisfactoryAll questions were answered but lacked specificity. One or more critical, strengths-based, or asset-based theories were used to critique the classic development theory.15 ptsNeeds ImprovementAnswers were vague. The application of theory to practice was not made.0 ptsUnsatisfactoryNone of the questions were answered.30 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestions for Initial Assessment• Identified three to five questions that would be used for an initial assessment that align with the theory selected for slide D. • Described the rationale for asking the question and its connection to the theory.25 ptsExcellentAll questions answered with depth. Rationale was clear and concise.20 ptsSatisfactoryAll questions were answered but lacked specificity. Rationale for questions needed clarity.13 ptsNeeds ImprovementAnswers were vague and unclear.0 ptsUnsatisfactoryNone of the questions were answered.25 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormat1. Answered all questions with explanation and detail. 2. Included at least three outside, credible, and relevant sources. 3. Included in-text citations. 4. Used the prescribed format of slides.20 ptsExcellentAll requirements met.15 ptsSatisfactory3 requirements met.10 ptsNeeds Improvement2 requirements met.0 ptsUnsatisfactory1 requirement met.20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCitation and Reference FormationUse the current APA Style standards to format citations and references free of errors.10 ptsExcellent0-1 errors.8 ptsSatisfactory2-3 errors.5 ptsNeeds Improvement4-5 errors.0 ptsUnsatisfactory6-7 errors.10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting RequirementsCommunicate with minimal English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation errors.10 ptsExcellent0-1 errors.8 ptsSatisfactory2-3 errors.5 ptsNeeds Improvement4-5 errors.0 ptsUnsatisfactory6-7 errors.10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate Deduction0 ptsNo Points DeductedSubmitted on time0 ptsPoints DeductedNot Submitted on Time - Points Deducted (5% deduction per day)0 pts Total Points: 150