Critically explores burnout and reduced team effectiveness using statistic/data and tools (if relevant) Addresses xyz organisational effectiveness and performance. Use of leadership theories and models relevant to healtheare

• PARTS

YES

NO

PARTS 1: 1500-word Critical Analysis

INTRODUCTION

•        Clear organizational structure and demography of xyz healthcare.

MAIN BODY: 

•        Critically explores burnout and reduced team effectiveness using statistic/data and tools (if relevant)

•        Addresses xyz organisational effectiveness and performance.

•        Use of leadership theories and models relevant to healthcare and application of systems thinking.

•        Critical analysis of its effect on organisational culture, health and wellbeing.

•        Consideration of leadership impact on workforce wellbeing

•        Identification of performance and quality improvement challenges

•        Evidence-based improvement strategies proposed

•        Addresses Module Learning Outcomes 1, 2, 3, 4

Part 2: 15-minute Presentation with 500-word Speaker Notes

•        Introduction slide included

•        Critical exploration of potential causes

•        Application of tools and techniques from the module

•        Implementation of Proposed leadership and development strategy (from PART 1)

•        Concluding critical reflection on organisational issues

•        Maximum of 11 slides

•        Audio or video narration included.

•        Speaker notes included after the 11 slides.

•        Addresses Module Learning Outcomes 1, 2, 5

Part 3: 500-word Personal Development Plan (PDP)

•        Use of self-assessment or diagnostic tools to demonstrate awareness of personal leadership style

•        Critical reflection on own leadership strengths and development (using reflection models if relevant) and mapped against professional codes (CMI COP and professional code of conduct if relevant)

•        Short and long-term goals clearly defined (SMART, PACT or equivalent) represented in a tabular format in the body of your essay. (NOT in the appendix please)

•        Actions for achieving identified goals including evaluating methods for progress (Relevant tools applied).

•        Addresses Module Learning Outcomes 1, 5

Mark Bands

Module LO1:

Critical

Exploration

of

Leadership

Theories and

Characteris tics of

Effective

Healthcare Leaders 

Module LO2:

Analysis of

Systems Thinking in Health

Systems

Module LO3:

Evaluation

of

Challenges and

Effectivene

ss in

Leading

Quality

Improveme

nts

Module LO4:

Examinatio

n of Organisatio nal Culture,

Health, and

Wellbeing

in

Leadership

Module LO5:

Applicatio n of Tools and

Technique s for Self-

Developm ent in

Leadershi

p

Written and

Verbal

Presentation

,

Communicat ion, and

Design 

Outstand ing (80-

100%)

Demonstrat

es exceptional critical analysis of leadership theories, leadership styles and impact, effectively identifying characteristi cs of highly effective and strategic healthcare leaders. Exceptional use of evidence and theory.

Provides an outstanding

critical

analysis of systems thinking in health systems, demonstrat ing deep understandi ng and strong theoretical integration.

Demonstrat

es exceptional

evaluation of challenges, effectivenes s, and impact in leading

quality

improveme

nts within health systems. Strong

critical depth.

Provides exceptional analysis of

organisation al culture, health and wellbeing and their impact on leadership demonstrati ng deep insights into health and wellbeing strategies.

Exceptiona lly applies diverse tools and

techniques

for self-

awareness

and self-

developme

nt, reflecting

critically on leadership growth with strong evidence and

application

.

Exceptionally clear, professional, creative and engaging written and verbal presentation. Outstanding use of visuals, structure, and academic tone. Timing and delivery of the verbal presentation are impeccable. Excellent use of relevant references

Excellent (70-79%)

Provides a thorough

critical analysis of leadership theories and styles, with strong discussion of effective healthcare leaders. Wellsupported

Offers a

comprehen

sive

analysis of systems thinking within health systems, showing strong theoretical connections and

Provides a strong

evaluation of leadership challenges

and quality improveme

nts, with some

insightful discussions.

Presents a strong discussion of

organisation al culture, health, and wellbeing, supported by relevant evidence and theoretical insights.

Applies a variety of self-

awareness

and self-

developme

nt tools and techniques with

strong

critical reflection on their

Clear, creative and professional written and verbal presentation with strong visuals and structure, as appropriate. Timing and delivery of the verbal presentation

by evidence and theory.

evidencebased discussion.

impact on leadership developme nt.

are effective. Very good use of relevant references.

Very

Good

(60-69%)

Offers a solid

discussion of leadership theories, styles and characteristi

cs of effective healthcare leaders.

Some minor gaps in integrating evidence and theory.

Provides a very good

analysis of systems thinking, with relevant examples and discussion, though some areas lack depth.

Evaluates leadership challenges

and quality improveme

nts with relevant evidence,

but critical depth may be inconsistent

.

Discusses organisation al culture including health and wellbeing in leadership with very good insight

and some strategies

but may lack critical

engagement

in certain areas.

Applies self-

awareness

and self-

developme

nt tools and techniques but with

some gaps

in critical reflection and leadership

application

.

Very good written and verbal presentation style and structure. Some minor issues with visuals, tone, or timing, as appropriate.  Good use of relevant references.

Good

(50-59%)

Provides a good

discussion of leadership theories and styles,

though

critical depth is limited.

Some

relevant examples used.

Discusses systems thinking in health systems but lacks depth or may rely on descriptive rather than analytical points.

Presents a good evaluation of leadership challenges

and quality improveme nts.

Discussion is present but lacks

strong

critical

engagement

.

Provides a good

discussion of

organisation al culture and health and wellbeing. Some important areas may be underexplor ed.

Uses self-

developme

nt tools but lacks critical reflection on their application to leadership growth.

Good written and verbal presentation with noticeable errors in visuals, structure, or timing.

Engagement may be inconsistent. Good use of relevant references.

Pass (4049%)

Offers a minimal

discussion of leadership theories and styles with limited critical engagement.

Provides a superficial analysis of systems thinking.

Some

points are relevant but lack clear theoretical

Offers a limited

evaluation of leadership challenges

and quality improveme nts.

Evidence

Discusses organisation al culture and health briefly, but the discussion is superficial and lacks strong

Demonstra

tes

minimal application

of self-

developme

nt tools, with little reflection on

Basic written presentation with significant issues in visuals, tone, or structure. Timing may be off.

Minimal use

Lacks depth in analysis and supporting evidence.

connections

.

may be weak or inconsistent ly applied.

supporting evidence.

leadership impact.

of relevant references. 

Fail (0-

39%)

Fails to critically explore leadership theories and styles or identify key characteristi

cs of effective healthcare leaders. Discussion is vague or

unsupporte d by evidence.

Fails to

demonstrat e an

understandi ng of systems thinking in health systems. Analysis is weak or absent.

Fails to evaluate leadership challenges

and quality improveme nts.

Discussion may be missing,

unclear, or

unsupporte d by evidence.

Fails to discuss organisation al culture including health and well-being and their role in leadership. Evidence and theoretical connections are absent or insufficient.

Lacks application

of self-

developme

nt tools and techniques, with no meaningful reflection on leadership developme nt.

Poorly structured and unclear presentation. Visuals and timing are inadequate. Engagement is minimal or absent. References not included.