💬 Request a Quote, It's FREE!!!

For each additional reading Formative Assignment (not the textbook chapters), write a 2-paragraph “reflection” (1000 words) to be submitted in Word

MRM700: Research Methods Reflection Formative Assignment

Formative Assignment: Reading Reflections (X2)

Word limit: 1,000 words each

Weighting: 20% of total assessment (Each reflection is worth 10%) Rationale

Writing these brief reflections on selected readings helps you think about the content of what you have read as well as connect them to insights from other parts of the module or elsewhere.

These reflections will also prepare you to contribute your insights with your fellow students during class discussions.

Assignment

For each additional reading Formative Assignment (not the textbook chapters), write a 2-paragraph “reflection” (1000 words) to be submitted in Word Doc format via LMS by 11:00 p.m. on the given due date.

Each reflection should communicate two things:

(1) a basic understanding of the content of the reading (paragraph 1), and

(2) your individual response to or thoughts about that topic (paragraph 2).

The latter should address the question: How does this reading change the way I think about research?

Reading Rubric

DEFINITIONS  RUBRIC MEASUREMENT RATINGS  
Rating CriteriaPoor
1 mark
Weak 2 markAdequate 3 markGood 4 markExcellent 5 markSpecific Evaluator Expectations
Topic1 UnderstandingReveals little understanding of the assigned reading. Absence of research questionReveals a superficial understanding without providing any specific piece of information. Provide research question incorrectlyReveals a relatively clear understanding and provides a single piece of information as evidence. Provide correct research question insufficientlyReveals clear understanding and provides more than one piece of information as evidence. Provide one correct research questionReveals excellent understanding and provides more than 2 pieces of information as evidence. Provide two correct research questions 
Topic1 discussed in depthPoor coverage of required topics covered to sufficient depthWeak coverage of required topics covered to sufficient depthFair coverage of required topics covered to sufficient depthRetrieving data. Wait a few seconds and try to cut or copy again.Excellent coverage of required topics covered to sufficient depth 
Topic2Reveals little understanding of the assigned reading. Absence of research questionReveals a superficial understanding without providing any specific piece of information. Provide research question incorrectlyReveals a relatively clear understanding and provides a single piece of information as evidence. Provide correct research question insufficientlyReveals clear understanding and provides more than one piece of information as evidence. Provide one correct research questionReveals excellent understanding and provides more than 2 pieces of information as evidence. Provide two correct research questions 
Topic2 discussed in depthPoor coverage of required topics covered to sufficient depthWeak coverage of required topics covered to sufficient depthFair coverage of required topics covered to sufficient depthRetrieving data. Wait a few seconds and try to cut or copy again.Excellent coverage of required topics covered to sufficient depth
WhatsApp