GBM6CYI Contemporary Issues in Global Business Management- Critically evaluate the key concepts, issues, definitions, and characteristics pertaining to global business issues, and assess understanding of the contested nature of these issues
LO1 Critically evaluate the key concepts, issues, definitions, and characteristics pertaining to global business issues, and assess understanding of the contested nature of these issues.
GBM6CYI Contemporary Issues in Global Business Management
Module code and title: | GBM6CYI Contemporary Issues in Global Business Management | Module leader: |
|
Assignment type: | Group Presentation | Assessment weighting: | 100% |
Submission time and date: | PowerPoints together with speaker notes to be submitted on or before your presentation day. | Target feedback time and date: | Weekly |
Assignment task |
You are required to prepare and present a Group PowerPoint Presentation of 30 minutes (100%) on one chosen contemporary issue addressed by the module content (e.g. crisis and innovation management). Your presentation must critically appraise and evaluate the chosen contemporary issue and the challenges it presents in the global business environment and discuss appropriate strategies to address these challenges. 50% of the presentation grade will be collectively assigned to the group based on given criteria such as clarity, content quality, engagement, visual aids, and time management. The remaining 50% will be determined by individual contributions, including preparation, communication skills, teamwork, responsibility and adaptability. The specific assignment rubric and grading criteria, together with the methods for assessing both group and individual components, will be transparent to students, aligning with The University of Suffolk’s Assessment of Group Work Policy, and GBS’s Assessment and Feedback Policy. |
This assignment has been designed to provide you with an opportunity to demonstrate your achievement of the following module learning outcomes: | |
LO1 | Critically evaluate the key concepts, issues, definitions, and characteristics pertaining to global business issues, and assess understanding of the contested nature of these issues. |
LO2 | Demonstrate a critical understanding of contemporary issues, challenges, and developments in the global business environment. |
LO3 | Critically analyse, evaluate, and formulate compelling strategies to address global issues, challenges, and developments. |
LO4 | Critically assess the ethical, social, and environmental considerations of global business decisions, and discuss the ethical challenges and tensions inherent in international business and management. |
Task requirements |
Overview You are presenting at a Global Business Conference in Dubrovnik (Croatia). The conference is intended for academics and business experts to explore and exchange ideas on contemporary issues businesses are facing globally, with a focus on the challenges and developments these present, and the strategies available to address them. TaskRequirements: In groups of no more than four students, you must prepare and deliver an annotated PowerPoint presentation that demonstrates a critical understanding of a chosen contemporary issue, including its challenges and developments in the global business environment. Your presentation should be exciting as befits the innovative nature of the Conference, and must:
Presentation Guidelines: Your PowerPoint presentation should comprise 12 -14 slides maximum (excluding Table of Contents and Reference Slides). Please include speaker notes at the bottom of each slide to augment key points made on the slide. Finally, use Appendices to provide supporting evidence for your arguments in the presentation, ensuring key points from the Appendices are incorporated into the slides. |
Referencing and research requirements |
Please reference your work according to the Harvard style; you can access guidance on this here: https://libguides.uos.ac.uk/academic/referencing/Harvard Use this link for legal references: https://www.citethemrightonline.com/QuicklinkReferences?menuid=7Crefid=1 |
How your work will be assessed |
Your work will be assessed on the extent to which it demonstrates your achievement of the stated learning outcomes for this assignment (see above) and against other key criteria, as defined in the University’s grading descriptors. This assignment will be marked according to the grading descriptors for Level 6. |
This assignment should be submitted electronically via Moodle (module tutors will discuss this process with you during class time).
- Please ensure that your work has been saved in an appropriate file format, Microsoft Word, Excel or PowerPoint are the most widely used. DO NOT upload your assignment in Pages format. Your file must contain at least 20 words of text, consist of fewer than 400 pages and be less than 40MB in size
- Your submission should be presented using the Aptos font, size 12, and the line spacing should be 1.5
- You can submit your work as many times as you like before the submission date. If you do submit your work more than once, your earlier submission will be replaced by the most recent version
- Once you have submitted your work, you will receive a digital receipt as proof of submission, which will be sent to your forwarded e-mail address (provided you have set this up). Please keep this receipt for future reference, along with the original electronic copy of your assignment
- You are reminded of the University’s regulations on academic misconduct, which can be viewed on the University website: https://www.uos.ac.uk/sites/default/files/Academic- Misconduct-Policy.pdf.
- Students who require learning support may contact Additional Learning Support here (URL) For additional academic support here https://moodle.globalbanking.ac.uk/course/index.php?categoryid=389
- In submitting your assignment, you are acknowledging that you have read and understood these regulations
General Grading Criteria
Level 6 | ||||||
In accordance with the FHEQ, at the end of Level 6 students should have coherent and detailed knowledge and understanding of their subject area, at least some of which is informed by the latest research and/or advanced scholarship within the discipline. They will be able to accurately deploy established techniques of analysis and enquiry within a discipline, using their conceptual understanding to devise and sustain arguments and/or to solve problems. They should be aware of the uncertainty, ambiguity and limits of knowledge. They should be able to critically evaluate evidence, arguments, assumptions, abstract concepts and data (that may be incomplete), to make judgements, and to frame appropriate questions to achieve a solution - or identify a range of solutions - to a problem. They should be able to communicate information, ideas, problems and solutions effectively to both specialist and non-specialist audiences. | ||||||
| Assessment category | |||||
Coherent and detailed knowledge and understanding of the subject area, at least some of which is informed by the latest research and/or advanced scholarship within the discipline | Cognitive and intellectual skills | Application of theory to practice (for courses with a professional practice element) | Reading and referencing | Presentation, style and structure Work that significantly exceeds the specified word limit may be penalized | ||
Pass mark, demonstrating | G0%-100% | Excellent work showing | Insightful and | Sophisticated application of theory to | Insightful and effective use of a | Exemplary presentation of work that is fluent |
flawless understanding of | exemplary use of | practice, demonstrating insightful | carefully selected range of | and flawless throughout. | ||
subject matter, explicitly | critical evaluation | selection of theory and flawless | relevant reading, including |
| ||
well-informed by the latest | skills to support | application to practice, drawing | literature informed by the latest |
| ||
research and/or advanced | sophisticated, | skilfully on the latest research within | research. Consistently |
| ||
scholarship within the | original and highly | the discipline. | accurate application of |
| ||
discipline. | coherent judgements |
| referencing. |
| ||
| and arguments |
|
|
| ||
|
|
| and/or creatively |
|
|
|
solve problems. | ||||||
Clearly articulates | ||||||
the significance of | ||||||
relationships | ||||||
between a range of | ||||||
ideas and concepts, | ||||||
enabling a new | ||||||
perspective to be | ||||||
applied. Selection | ||||||
and use of relevant | ||||||
supporting evidence | ||||||
is flawless. Work is | ||||||
innovative, | ||||||
demonstrating | ||||||
outstanding | ||||||
originality and | ||||||
creativity of thought | ||||||
and approach. | ||||||
80%-8G% | High quality work showing | Excellent use of | Excellent application of theory to | Consistent and balanced | Highly effective presentation of work that is | |
fluent, deep and highly | critical evaluation | practice, with all links fully | engagement with a refined | coherently structured and clearly expressed | ||
detailed knowledge and | skills to apposite and | appropriate and meaningfully | range of relevant reading, | throughout. | ||
understanding of subject | highly coherent | applied, drawing skilfully on the latest | including literature informed by |
| ||
matter, explicitly well- | judgements and | research within the discipline. | the latest research. |
| ||
informed by the latest | arguments and/or |
| Consistently accurate |
| ||
research and/or advanced | creatively solve |
| application of referencing. |
| ||
scholarship within the | problems. Clearly |
|
|
| ||
discipline. | articulates the |
|
|
| ||
| significance of |
|
|
| ||
| relationships |
|
|
| ||
| between a range of |
|
|
| ||
| ideas and concepts, |
|
|
| ||
| enabling a new perspective to be applied. Use of a wide and carefully selected range of relevant supporting evidence. Work shows excellent originality and creativity of thought and approach. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 6 | Coherent and detailed knowledge and understanding | Cognitive and intellectual skills | Application of theory to practice | Reading and referencing | Presentation, style and structure | |
Pass mark, demonstrating achievement of all associated learning | 70% – 7G% | Commendable work showing coherent and detailed knowledge and understanding of subject matter, explicitly informed by the latest research and/or advanced scholarship within the discipline. | Effective use of critical evaluation skills to make well- informed and coherent judgements and arguments and/or creatively solve problems. Clearly articulates the significance of relationships between a range of ideas and concepts, enabling a new perspective to be applied. Use of a wide range of relevant supporting evidence. Work shows effective originality and creativity of thought and approach. | Consistent and balanced engagement with a refined range of relevant reading, including literature informed by the latest research. Consistently accurate application of referencing. | Consistent engagement with an extensive range of relevant reading, including literature informed by the latest research. Consistently accurate application of referencing. | Well-formed presentation of work that is coherently structured and clearly expressed throughout. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60% – 6G% | Work of solid quality showing competent and consistent knowledge and understanding of subject matter, informed by the latest research and/or advanced scholarship within the discipline. | Sound use of critical evaluation skills to make well-informed judgements and arguments and/or solve problems. Usually articulates the significance of relationships between a range of ideas and concepts. Use of a good range of relevant supporting evidence. Work shows significant evidence of originality and creativity which contributes to the overall assignment. | Sound understanding and evaluation of application of theory to practice, with the student making clearly articulated and reasoned links between the two, informed by the latest research within the discipline. | Critical engagement with a good range of relevant reading, including literature informed by the latest research Sound application of referencing, with no inaccuracies or inconsistencies. | Competent presentation of work in terms of structure and clarity of expression. | |
50% – 5G% | Adequate work showing knowledge and understanding of subject matter, but lacking depth and breadth. Awareness of the latest research and/or advanced scholarship within the discipline. | Use of critical evaluation skills to make largely logical and coherent judgements and arguments and/or solve problems, but with gaps and/or inconsistencies. Use of an adequate range of relevant supporting evidence. Work provides examples of originality and creativity, which enhances aspects of the assignment. | Mainly consistent, accurate and logical application of theory to practice, with the student making appropriate links between the two and evidence of evaluation. | Engagement with an appropriate range of reading beyond essential texts, including literature informed by the latest research. Referencing may show minor inaccuracies or inconsistencies. | Work is structured in a largely coherent manner and is for the most part clearly expres |