MGT 6175 – Management Responsibility and Practice Graduate Paper Instructions: This assignment is a written paper based upon current scholarly literature in the area of management responsibility and practic
Amberton University
MGT 6175 – Management Responsibility and Practice
Graduate Paper
Instructions:
This assignment is a written paper based upon current scholarly literature in the area of management responsibility and practice. The specific focus of the paper should be on one of the following two topics: 1) motivation, OR 2) team leadership. The paper will be twelve written pages in length and constructed as a literature review per the current APA Manual (6th edition). The paper will include a title page (per APA format), which will not count as a one of the twelve required pages. The paper should use the format below for headings and written in paragraph form. The paper should be free of grammatical and spelling errors and exhibit quality written scholarship commensurate with graduate standards. A minimum of 15 scholarly, peer-reviewed sources should be used in the paper. The final section of the literature review should make recommendations for future research based upon your explication of the literature. Please make solid recommendations that are fully supported by logical rationale.
|
Criteria |
Unacceptable = 5 point per box |
Acceptable = 15 points per box |
Excellent = 20 points per box |
|
Clarity, |
Topic,
purpose, issue or claim is not clearly stated or supported. |
Claim is
vaguely stated and minimally supported. Paper not well organized/confusing. |
Clearly
states issue/ argument and supports with adequate information. Paper is well
organized. |
|
Significance
and |
Ideas, facts
or points are not relevant to the issue/purpose/claim |
Some points
are relevant to the issue/claim |
All points
presented relevant and connected to the issue at hand/purpose/claim. |
|
Accuracy, |
Details and
meaning are absent, vague, or ambiguous |
Some
precision is used; details marginally convey meaning of purpose |
Adequately
conveyed meaning of claim and exhibited full comprehension of topic |
|
APA Usage |
APA standards
are not met |
APA standards
are correct in much of the paper, although numerous errors were made |
APA standards
are met flawlessly |
|
Future |
A
recommendation for future research is not made |
A
recommendation is weakly made and largely unsupported |
A clear
recommendation is made and well supported |