Write My Paper Button

WhatsApp Widget

NU673 Units 2 and 8 PMHNP Journal

Rubric Title: NU673 Units 2 and 8 PMHNP Journal Grading Rubric 

Assignment Criteria

Level III

Level II

Level I

Not Present

Criteria 1

Level III Max

Points: 12

Level II Max

Points: 9.6

Level I Max

Points: 7.2

Not Present

0 Points

Content of Paper

       Demonstrates a well-articulated understanding of the subject matter in a clear, complex, and informative manner

       Develops content and theories are well

       Links content to the paper requirements and practical experience

       Includes relevant material that fulfills all objectives of the paper

       Uses scholarly resources that were not provided in the course materials

       Completes all instruction requirements

       Demonstrates an understanding of the subject matter

       Explains and applies knowledge of evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role

       Uses a variety of scholarly resources from the course material and some that were not provided in the course materials

       Includes relevant material that fulfills all objectives of the paper.

       Completes all instruction requirements

       Demonstrates a moderate understanding of the subject matter

       Summarizes content with minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role-development

       Presents content but is missing depth and or development

       Uses only scholarly resources that were provided in the course materials
Completes most instruction requirements

       Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 2

Level III Max

Points: 12

Level II Max

Points: 9.6

Level I Max

Points: 7.2

Not Present

0 Points

Analysis and Synthesis of Paper Content and Meaning

       Provides critical analysis in an accurate, clear, concise, and complete presentation of the required content

       Synthesizes information from scholarly resources

       Provides new information or insight related to the context of the assignment with both supportive and alternative information or viewpoints

       Completes all instruction requirements

       Provides evidence of further synthesis of course content via scholarly resources

       Synthesizes information to help fulfill paper requirements

       Supports content with at least one viewpoint.

       Completes all instruction requirements

       Lacks clarification or new information

       Supports content with scholarly reference without adding any new information or insight

       Provides content that may be confusing or unclear, and the summary may be incomplete

       Completes most instruction requirements

       Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 3

Level III Max

Points: 8

Level II Max

Points: 6.4

Level I Max

Points: 4.8

Not Present

0 Points

Application of Knowledge

       Offers a multidisciplinary approach via scholarly resources

       Applies practice that is accurate and plausible

       Supports practice with additional scholarly resources

       Answers all questions posed within the assignment in a well-developed manner with citations for validation

       Completes all instruction requirements

       Presents a summary of the paper’s content, findings, and knowledge gained

       Indicates how the information will be used within their professional practice

       Completes all instruction requirements

       Lacks objective criteria

       Applies superficial bridge between the assignment and the broader course content

       Indicates how they will apply this new knowledge to their clinical practice in a vague manner

       Completes most instruction requirements

       Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 4

Level III Max

Points: 4

Level II Max

Points: 3.2

Level I Max

Points: 2.4

Not Present

0 Points

Organization

       Provides well-organized content with a clear and complex purpose statement and content argument

       Provides concise writing with a logical flow of ideas

       Provides organized content with an informative purpose statement and supportive content and summary statement

       Provides argument content with minimal issues in content flow

       Provides poor organization, and flow of ideas distract from content

       Provides a purpose statement

       Provides narrative that is difficult to follow and frequently causes reader to reread work

       Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 5

 

Level III Max

Points: 4

Level II Max

Points: 3.2

Level I Max

Points: 2.4

Not Present

0 Points

College-level academic writing

       Includes no more than three grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors that do not interfere with the readability

       Includes no more than four grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors that do not interfere with the readability

 

       Includes five or more grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors makes understanding parts of assignment difficult, but does not interfere with readability

       Does not meet the criteria

Maximum Total Points

40

32

24

0

Minimum Total Points

33 points minimum

25 points minimum

1 point minimum

0

 

Rubric Title: NU673 Units 4 and 9 Kaltura/Self-reflection Video Rubric

 

Assignment Criteria

Level III

Level II

Level I

Not Present

Criteria 1

Level III Max

Points: 5

Level II Max

Points: 4

Level I Max

Points: 3

Not Present

0 Points

Content Reflection

 

       Reflection demonstrates a high degree of critical thinking in applying, analyzing, and evaluating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, media, discussions activities, and/or assignments.

       Insightful and relevant connections made through contextual explanations, inferences, and examples.

       Answers all the questions in the self-reflection video prompt.

       Reflection demonstrates some degree of critical thinking in applying, analyzing, and/or evaluating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, media, discussions activities, and/or assignments.

       Connections made through explanations, inferences, and/or examples.

       Answers only part of the questions in the self-reflection video prompt.

       Reflection demonstrates limited critical thinking in applying, analyzing, and/or evaluating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, media, discussions, activities, and/or assignments

       Minimal connections made through explanations, inferences, and/or examples.

       Answers only a few of the questions in the self-reflection video prompt.

       Does not meet the criteria.

Criteria 2

Level III Max

Points: 5

Level II Max

Points: 4

Level I Max

Points: 3

Not Present

0 Points

Personal Growth

 

       Conveys strong evidence of reflection on own work with a personal response to the self-assessment questions posed.

       Demonstrates significant personal growth and awareness of deeper meaning through inferences made examples, well-developed insights, and substantial depth in perceptions and challenges.

       Synthesizes current experience into future implications.

       Conveys evidence of reflection on own work with a personal response to the self-assessment questions posed.

       Demonstrates satisfactory personal growth and awareness through some inferences made, examples, insights, and challenges.

       Some thought of the future implications of current experience.

       Conveys limited evidence of reflection on own work in response to the self-assessment questions posed.

       Demonstrates less than adequate personal growth and awareness through few or simplistic inferences made, examples, insights, and/or challenges that are not well developed.

       Minimal thought of the future implications of current experience.

        

Criteria 3

Level III Max

Points: 5

Level II Max

Points: 4

Level I Max

Points: 3

Not Present

0 Points

Quality

Includes all of the following:

 

       Excellent presentation. Is well lighted with face visible.

       Clear diction when communicating.

       Professionalism is present.

Includes all of the following:

 

       Above average presentation.

       Area is lighted for visibility, clear diction and communication used.

       Professionalism present.

Includes all of the following:

 

       Casual presentation and communication.

       Professionalism needs improvement.

       Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 4

Level III Max

Points: 5

Level II Max

Points: 4

Level I Max

Points: 3

Not Present

0 Points

Timeliness

 

       Journal reflection is completed within three to five minutes.

       Journal reflection is greater than five minutes or less than two minutes.

       Journal reflection is less than 2 minutes

       Does not meet the criteria

Maximum Total Points

20

16

12

0

Minimum Total Points

17 points minimum

13 points minimum

1 point minimum

0

 

Rubric Title: NU673 Units 4, 6, and 9 Assignment Rubric

Assignment Criteria

Level III

Level II

Level I

Not Present

Criteria 1

Level III Max

Points: 12

Level II Max

Points: 8

Level I Max

Points: 6

Not Present

0 Points

Subjective Data

       Includes all relevant subjective data necessary for differentiation of the client’s problem.

       Data is presented in a systematic, organized manner

       Includes most subjective data with omission of two minor details or one major detail.

       Most data is presented in a systematic, organized manner

       Includes subjective data but omits four minor details or two major details.

       Some data is presented in a systematic, organized manner

       Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 2

Level III Max

Points: 12

Level II Max

Points: 8

Level I Max

Points: 6

Not Present

0 Points

Objective Data

       Objective data is complete and presented in an organized manner

       Objective data is complete and presented in an organized manner most of the time

     Objective data is not complete or is not presented in an organized manner

       Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 3

Level III Max

Points: 12

Level II Max

Points: 8

Level I Max

Points: 6

Not Present

0 Points

Assessment

       Assessment, including differential and/or diagnosis (if appropriate), is complete and appropriate to the client.

       Diagnostics are complete and appropriate to clients

       Assessment, including differential and/or diagnosis (if appropriate), is complete but some may not be appropriate for clients

       Assessment, including differential and/or diagnosis (if appropriate), is not complete but is appropriate

       Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 4

Level III Max

Points: 12

Level II Max

Points: 8

Level I Max

Points: 6

Not Present

0 Points

Plan

       Plan includes all relevant measures 95% to 100% Pharmacologic Non-pharmacologic Education Referral Follow-up

       Answers all questions applying evidence-based practice guidelines.

       Plan includes all relevant measures 89% to 94% Pharmacologic Non-Pharmacologic Education Referral Follow-up

       Answers a few questions applying evidence-based practice guidelines.

       Plan includes four of the five relevant measures, but the four are complete.

       Answers a few questions. Lack of application of evidence-based practice guidelines.

       Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 5

Level III Max

Points: 6

Level II Max

Points: 4

Level I Max

Points: 3

Not Present

0 Points

Professional

Application

       Case incorporates three (3) evidence-based practice articles from the past five (5) years

       Case incorporates two (2) evidence-based practice articles from the past five (5) years

       Case incorporates only one (1) evidence-based practice article from the past five (5) years or has any number of non-evidenced-based articles with no evidenced-based articles

       Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 6

 

Level III Max

Points: 6

Level II Max

Points: 4

Level I Max

Points: 3

Not Present

0 Points

College-level academic writing

       Includes no more than three grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors that do not interfere with the readability.

       Meets the assignment length requirements

 

       Includes no more than four grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors that do not interfere with the readability

       Meets the length requirements

 

       Includes five or more grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors makes understanding parts of assignment difficult, but does not interfere with readability

       Meets the length requirements

 

       Does not meet the criteria

Maximum Total Points

60

40

30

0

Minimum Total Points

41 points minimum

31 points minimum

1 point minimum

0

 

Rubric Title: NU673 Units 4 and 8 Virtual Reality Lab Rubric

Virtual reality patient scenarios must be completed using the Oculus headset unless ADA accommodations have been approved. If not completed via the Oculus headset, a zero will be given.

Assignment Criteria

Level III Max

Level II Max

Level I Max

Not Present

Criteria 1

Level III

Points: 60

Level II

Points: 48

Level I

Points: 36

Not Present

0 Points

Total Score

       Obtains a total score between 81% to 100% on the virtual reality patient scenario

       Obtains a total score between 61% to 80% on the virtual reality patient scenario

       Obtains a total score between 41% to 60% on the virtual reality patient scenario

       Does not attempt patient scenario

       Obtains a total score of 40% or below

       Does not meet the criteria

Maximum Total Points

60 points

48 points

36 points

0 points

Minimum Total Points

60 points

48 points

36 points

0 points

 

 

Updated 4/15/2023