NU673 Units 2 and 8 PMHNP Journal

Criteria 1

Level III Max

Points: 12

Level II Max

Points: 9.6

Level I Max

Points: 7.2

Not Present

0 Points

Content of Paper

●       Demonstrates a well-articulated understanding of the subject matter in a clear, complex, and informative manner

●       Develops content and theories are well

●       Links content to the paper requirements and practical experience

●       Includes relevant material that fulfills all objectives of the paper

●       Uses scholarly resources that were not provided in the course materials

●       Completes all instruction requirements

●       Demonstrates an understanding of the subject matter

●       Explains and applies knowledge of evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role

●       Uses a variety of scholarly resources from the course material and some that were not provided in the course materials

●       Includes relevant material that fulfills all objectives of the paper.

●       Completes all instruction requirements

●       Demonstrates a moderate understanding of the subject matter

●       Summarizes content with minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role-development

●       Presents content but is missing depth and or development

●       Uses only scholarly resources that were provided in the course materials
Completes most instruction requirements

●       Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 2

Level III Max

Points: 12

Level II Max

Points: 9.6

Level I Max

Points: 7.2

Not Present

0 Points

Analysis and Synthesis of Paper Content and Meaning

●       Provides critical analysis in an accurate, clear, concise, and complete presentation of the required content

●       Synthesizes information from scholarly resources

●       Provides new information or insight related to the context of the assignment with both supportive and alternative information or viewpoints

●       Completes all instruction requirements

●       Provides evidence of further synthesis of course content via scholarly resources

●       Synthesizes information to help fulfill paper requirements

●       Supports content with at least one viewpoint.

●       Completes all instruction requirements

●       Lacks clarification or new information

●       Supports content with scholarly reference without adding any new information or insight

●       Provides content that may be confusing or unclear, and the summary may be incomplete

●       Completes most instruction requirements

●       Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 3

Level III Max

Points: 8

Level II Max

Points: 6.4

Level I Max

Points: 4.8

Not Present

0 Points

Application of Knowledge

●       Offers a multidisciplinary approach via scholarly resources

●       Applies practice that is accurate and plausible

●       Supports practice with additional scholarly resources

●       Answers all questions posed within the assignment in a well-developed manner with citations for validation

●       Completes all instruction requirements

●       Presents a summary of the paper’s content, findings, and knowledge gained

●       Indicates how the information will be used within their professional practice

●       Completes all instruction requirements

●       Lacks objective criteria

●       Applies superficial bridge between the assignment and the broader course content

●       Indicates how they will apply this new knowledge to their clinical practice in a vague manner

●       Completes most instruction requirements

●       Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 4

Level III Max

Points: 4

Level II Max

Points: 3.2

Level I Max

Points: 2.4

Not Present

0 Points

Organization

●       Provides well-organized content with a clear and complex purpose statement and content argument

●       Provides concise writing with a logical flow of ideas

●       Provides organized content with an informative purpose statement and supportive content and summary statement

●       Provides argument content with minimal issues in content flow

●       Provides poor organization, and flow of ideas distract from content

●       Provides a purpose statement

●       Provides narrative that is difficult to follow and frequently causes reader to reread work

●       Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 5

Level III Max

Points: 4

Level II Max

Points: 3.2

Level I Max

Points: 2.4

Not Present

0 Points

College-level academic writing

●       Includes no more than three grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors that do not interfere with the readability

●       Includes no more than four grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors that do not interfere with the readability

●       Includes five or more grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors makes understanding parts of assignment difficult, but does not interfere with readability

●       Does not meet the criteria

Maximum Total Points

40

32

24

0

Minimum Total Points

33 points minimum

25 points minimum

1 point minimum

0

Assignment Criteria

Level III

Level II

Level I

Not Present

Criteria 1

Level III Max

Points: 5

Level II Max

Points: 4

Level I Max

Points: 3

Not Present

0 Points

Content Reflection

●       Reflection demonstrates a high degree of critical thinking in applying, analyzing, and evaluating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, media, discussions activities, and/or assignments.

●       Insightful and relevant connections made through contextual explanations, inferences, and examples.

●       Answers all the questions in the self-reflection video prompt.

●       Reflection demonstrates some degree of critical thinking in applying, analyzing, and/or evaluating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, media, discussions activities, and/or assignments.

●       Connections made through explanations, inferences, and/or examples.

●       Answers only part of the questions in the self-reflection video prompt.

●       Reflection demonstrates limited critical thinking in applying, analyzing, and/or evaluating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, media, discussions, activities, and/or assignments

●       Minimal connections made through explanations, inferences, and/or examples.

●       Answers only a few of the questions in the self-reflection video prompt.

●       Does not meet the criteria.

Criteria 2

Level III Max

Points: 5

Level II Max

Points: 4

Level I Max

Points: 3

Not Present

0 Points

Personal Growth

●       Conveys strong evidence of reflection on own work with a personal response to the self-assessment questions posed.

●       Demonstrates significant personal growth and awareness of deeper meaning through inferences made examples, well-developed insights, and substantial depth in perceptions and challenges.

●       Synthesizes current experience into future implications.

●       Conveys evidence of reflection on own work with a personal response to the self-assessment questions posed.

●       Demonstrates satisfactory personal growth and awareness through some inferences made, examples, insights, and challenges.

●       Some thought of the future implications of current experience.

●       Conveys limited evidence of reflection on own work in response to the self-assessment questions posed.

●       Demonstrates less than adequate personal growth and awareness through few or simplistic inferences made, examples, insights, and/or challenges that are not well developed.

●       Minimal thought of the future implications of current experience.

●        

Criteria 3

Level III Max

Points: 5

Level II Max

Points: 4

Level I Max

Points: 3

Not Present

0 Points

Quality

Includes all of the following:

●       Excellent presentation. Is well lighted with face visible.

●       Clear diction when communicating.

●       Professionalism is present.

Includes all of the following:

●       Above average presentation.

●       Area is lighted for visibility, clear diction and communication used.

●       Professionalism present.

Includes all of the following:

●       Casual presentation and communication.

●       Professionalism needs improvement.

●       Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 4

Level III Max

Points: 5

Level II Max

Points: 4

Level I Max

Points: 3

Not Present

0 Points

Timeliness

●       Journal reflection is completed within three to five minutes.

●       Journal reflection is greater than five minutes or less than two minutes.

●       Journal reflection is less than 2 minutes

●       Does not meet the criteria

Maximum Total Points

20

16

12

0

Minimum Total Points

17 points minimum

13 points minimum

1 point minimum

0

Criteria 1

Level III Max

Points: 12

Level II Max

Points: 8

Level I Max

Points: 6

Not Present

0 Points

Subjective Data

●       Includes all relevant subjective data necessary for differentiation of the client’s problem.

●       Data is presented in a systematic, organized manner

●       Includes most subjective data with omission of two minor details or one major detail.

●       Most data is presented in a systematic, organized manner

●       Includes subjective data but omits four minor details or two major details.

●       Some data is presented in a systematic, organized manner

●       Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 2

Level III Max

Points: 12

Level II Max

Points: 8

Level I Max

Points: 6

Not Present

0 Points

Objective Data

●       Objective data is complete and presented in an organized manner

●       Objective data is complete and presented in an organized manner most of the time

●     Objective data is not complete or is not presented in an organized manner

●       Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 3

Level III Max

Points: 12

Level II Max

Points: 8

Level I Max

Points: 6

Not Present

0 Points

Assessment

●       Assessment, including differential and/or diagnosis (if appropriate), is complete and appropriate to the client.

●       Diagnostics are complete and appropriate to clients

●       Assessment, including differential and/or diagnosis (if appropriate), is complete but some may not be appropriate for clients

●       Assessment, including differential and/or diagnosis (if appropriate), is not complete but is appropriate

●       Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 4

Level III Max

Points: 12

Level II Max

Points: 8

Level I Max

Points: 6

Not Present

0 Points

Plan

●       Plan includes all relevant measures 95% to 100% Pharmacologic Non-pharmacologic Education Referral Follow-up

●       Answers all questions applying evidence-based practice guidelines.

●       Plan includes all relevant measures 89% to 94% Pharmacologic Non-Pharmacologic Education Referral Follow-up

●       Answers a few questions applying evidence-based practice guidelines.

●       Plan includes four of the five relevant measures, but the four are complete.

●       Answers a few questions. Lack of application of evidence-based practice guidelines.

●       Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 5

Level III Max

Points: 6

Level II Max

Points: 4

Level I Max

Points: 3

Not Present

0 Points

Professional

Application

●       Case incorporates three (3) evidence-based practice articles from the past five (5) years

●       Case incorporates two (2) evidence-based practice articles from the past five (5) years

●       Case incorporates only one (1) evidence-based practice article from the past five (5) years or has any number of non-evidenced-based articles with no evidenced-based articles

●       Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 6

Level III Max

Points: 6

Level II Max

Points: 4

Level I Max

Points: 3

Not Present

0 Points

College-level academic writing

●       Includes no more than three grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors that do not interfere with the readability.

●       Meets the assignment length requirements

●       Includes no more than four grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors that do not interfere with the readability

●       Meets the length requirements

●       Includes five or more grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors makes understanding parts of assignment difficult, but does not interfere with readability

●       Meets the length requirements

●       Does not meet the criteria

Maximum Total Points

60

40

30

0

Minimum Total Points

41 points minimum

31 points minimum

1 point minimum

0

Assignment Criteria

Level III Max

Level II Max

Level I Max

Not Present

Criteria 1

Level III

Points: 60

Level II

Points: 48

Level I

Points: 36

Not Present

0 Points

Total Score

●       Obtains a total score between 81% to 100% on the virtual reality patient scenario

●       Obtains a total score between 61% to 80% on the virtual reality patient scenario

●       Obtains a total score between 41% to 60% on the virtual reality patient scenario

●       Does not attempt patient scenario

●       Obtains a total score of 40% or below

●       Does not meet the criteria

Maximum Total Points

60 points

48 points

36 points

0 points

Minimum Total Points

60 points

48 points

36 points

0 points