PURPOSE Select any middle-range nursing theory and do a PowerPoint presentation on ways in which the theory is applicable to your practice. END OF COURSE STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES Critically analyze
PURPOSE
Select any middle-range nursing theory and do a PowerPoint presentation on ways in which the theory is applicable to your practice.
END OF COURSE STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES
Critically analyze the philosophical underpinnings of nursing theories.
|
|
Critique nursing’s conceptual models, grand theories, and mid-range theories.
Examine the influence that nursing models and theories have upon research and practice.
Apply nursing theory or theories to nursing research.
End of Program Student Learning Outcomes
Integrate nursing and related sciences into the delivery of care to clients across diverse healthcare settings
Evaluate the effectiveness of clinical prevention interventions that affect individual and population-based health outcomes, perform risk assessments, and design plans or programs of care
Relate knowledge of illness and disease management to providing evidence-based care to clients, communities, and vulnerable populations in an evolving healthcare delivery system. Integrate nursing and related sciences into the delivery of care to clients across diverse healthcare settings
DUE DATE: Submit to the Moodle by Saturday of the end Week 7 at 11:59 p.m. ET. POINTS: This assignment is worth a total of 100 points.
REQUIREMENTS
To complete this assignment, you will need to access the Miami Regional University virtual library database: CINAHL Complete Database, MEDLINE Complete Database, LIRN, and so forth. Our Librarian is available to help on campus from Monday to Friday 7:30 am to 9:00 pm & Saturday 8:00 am to 3:00 pm.
Remember we now also have a Ask a Librarian option 7 days a week available in Moodle.
This assignment is worth 100 points and will be graded on the required components as summarized in the directions and grading criteria/rubric. This assignment will be graded on quality of information, use of citations, use of Standard English grammar, sentence structure, and overall organization based on the required components as summarized in the directions and grading criteria and rubric. Ã APA format and effective writing is required for the paper.
|
|
Use Microsoft PowerPoint
Follow the directions and grading criteria closely. Any questions about this presentation may be posted under the Q & A Forum.
The length of the presentation is to be approximately 8 slides excluding the title page and reference pages.
This presentation will be submitted through Turnitin, a Turnitin similarity score of 20% or less is expected.
A minimum of 6 current scholarly references that are 5 years old or less.
DIRECTIONS AND GRADING CRITERIA
|
Category |
Points |
% |
Description |
|
Introduction
|
10 |
10 |
Discuss the historical background
of middle range. |
|
Analysis
of the underpinning for the theory you select |
25 |
25 |
Discuss
the analysis of the underpinning for middle range you selected. Theoretical
or background work that has been done in the field that will support the formation
/creation of theory |
|
Applications of the Theory |
25 |
25 |
Explain how the middle range is
used in practice. |
|
Suggestion for additional
research |
25 |
25 |
Discuss the need for additional
research |
|
Conclusion
|
10 |
10 |
All resources correctly
referenced |
|
|
|
APA
Format & Clarity of writing |
5 |
5 |
APA format
corrects with no more than 1-2 minor errors: Use of a minimum of six current
scholarly references. |
|
Total: |
100 pts |
100 % |
A quality paper will
meet or exceed all of the above requirements. |
GRADING RUBRIC
|
Assignment Criteria |
Exceed
in Meeting the Criteria |
Meet Criteria |
Partially Meet Criteria |
Does Not Meet
Criteria |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Introduction
(10
points) |
Excellent introduction that includes discussion the historical background of the middle range
theory you selected 10
points |
Good introduction that includes discussion the
historical background of the middle range theory you selected 7
points |
Basic introduction that includes discussion the
historical background of the middle range theory you selected 4
points |
Little or very general introduction of the
assignment and purpose. Introduction not well developed. 0
points |
|
Analysis of the underpinning for the Middle Range Theory you selected. (25 points)
|
Student provides an excellent
discussion on the analysis of the underpinning for the middle range theory
which is the theoretical or background work that has been done in the field
that will |
Student
provides a good discussion the analysis of the underpinning for the middle
range which is the theoretical or background work that has been done in the
field that will support formation /creation of theory 17
points |
Basic discussion on the analysis of the
underpinning for middle range which is the theoretical or background work
that has been done in the field that will support formation /creation of
theory |
Little or very general discussion on the analysis
of the underpinning for the middle range which is the theoretical or
background work that has been done in the field that will support formation
/creation of theory |
|
|
support formation /creation of theory 25
points |
|
11
points |
<
10 points |
|
Applications of the Middle Range Theory (25 points) |
Excellent
description of how the theory is used in practice. Used approximately 4 examples. 25
points |
Good
description of how the theory is used in practice. Used approximately 3 examples. 20
points |
Basic description of how the theory is used in
practice. Used approximately 2
examples. 15
points |
Little
to No description of how the theory is used in practice. Used approximately 1 or no examples. 10
or less points |
|
Suggestion for
additional research (25 points) |
Excellent description for suggestion for
additional research. 25
points |
Good
description for suggestion for additional research. 20
points |
Basic
description for suggestion for additional research. 17
points |
Little
to no description for suggestion for additional research. 10
points or less |
|
Conclusion
(10
points) |
Provide an
excellent summary of the main point of the content of the PowerPoint presentation. 10
points |
Provide a good summary of the main point of the
content of the PowerPoint presentation. 7
points |
Provide a basic summary of the
content of the PowerPoint presentation. 4
points |
Provide little summary of the
main point of the content of the PowerPoint presentation. 0
points |
|
APA
format & Use of a minimum of six current scholarly references. Clarity
of writing. (5
points) |
APA format is correct with no more than 1–2 minor
errors Use of a minimum of six current scholarly
references. 5
points |
Three to five errors in APA format and/or 1–2
citations missing. Use of a minimum of three to five current
scholarly references. 4
points |
Five to six errors in APA format and/or 3–4
citations missing. Use of a minimum of three to five current
scholarly references. 3
points |
APA formatting contains multiple errors and/or
several citations missing Use none to two scholarly references; or use of
outdated scholarly references. 2
points |
