Write My Paper Button

WhatsApp Widget

STA457H1S (Time Series Analysis), Winter 2025 Page limit for the main report:

Rubric for the final group project
STA457H1S (Time Series Analysis), Winter 2025
Page limit for the main report: 15 pages and Appendix: 20 pages
DOMAIN GRADE WEIGHT
5 4 3 2




Writing and
Organization
(a) Excellent critical
evaluation and analysis of
evidence expressed in a
well-reasoned and logical
manner. (b) No
grammatical or spelling
errors. (c) Appropriate
citations (if applicable) (d)
Excellent presentation of
graphs/tables.
(a) Good critical
evaluation and analysis
of evidence expressed in
a reasoned, logical
manner. (b) There are
few spelling or
grammatical errors. (c)
Cites work/data if
necessary. (d) Good
presentation.
(a) Competent critical
evaluation and analysis of
evidence expressed with
basic reasoning and logic.
(b) Some spelling or
grammatical errors. (c)
Cites work/data if
necessary. (d) At least an
acceptable presentation.
(a) Limited evidence of critical
evaluation and analysis of
evidence expressed with basic
reasoning and logic. (b) Spelling
or grammatical errors are
evident. (c) Failure to cite
work/data. (d) The presentation
needs significant improvement.

1.0


Method
Correctness
(a) Demonstrates
superior grasp of course
subject matter. (b) The
content is accurate.
(a) Demonstrates
evidence of good
familiarity with course
subject matter. (b) The
content is mostly
accurate.
(a) Demonstrates some
understanding of course
subject matter. (b) The
content has some
inaccuracies.

(a) Demonstrates poor
understanding of course subject
matter. (b) The content has many
inaccuracies.

1.0


Prediction
Performance
(a) Excellent justification
for which the built model
is the best. (b) High
demonstration of the
reliability of forecasted
results.
(a) Good justification for
which the built model is
the best. (b)
Demonstrate the
reliability of forecasted
results.
(a) Some justification for
which the built model is
the best. (b) low
demonstration of the
reliability of forecasted
results.
(a) Poor justification for which
the built model is the best. (b)
Poor demonstration of the
reliability of forecasted results.

1.0


Creativity
(a) Excellent creativity in
the construction of
models. (b) Excellent
identification of models.
(a) Good creativity in the
construction of models.
(b) Suitable identification
of models.
(a) Satisfactory creativity
in the construction of
models. (b) Satisfactory
identification of models.
(a) Improper creativity in the
construction of models. (b)
Improper identification of
models.
1.0

Score out ______ of 20