Task 1: Nature of Process Improvement/ Lean Management (LO1, LO5) Critically evaluate three (3) concepts used within Lean Management methodologies considering the following key themes, continuous improvement, process
ASSIGNMENT DETAILS
Using your chosen service, you will investigate how the existing process operates from the customer's perspective and identify areas where operational performance can be improved. You should examine the current workflow, making informed assumptions about internal activities where necessary, and evaluate opportunities to enhance efficiency, service quality, customer satisfaction, and sustainability. Based on your analysis, you will develop two alternative process improvement proposals, recommend the most appropriate solution, and explain how it could be successfully implemented using suitable project management principles.
Your report must include the following 4 tasks:
Task 1: Nature of Process Improvement/ Lean Management (LO1, LO5)
Critically evaluate three (3) concepts used within Lean Management methodologies considering the following key themes, continuous improvement, process improvement methodologies, process mapping and how they are linked to sustainability. When showing your understanding of the concepts, you should apply these to your chosen government service.
Task 2: Process Analysis and Modelling (LO2, LO3)
Analyse a process (from a customer perspective) for the government department. You should scope the business process problem and subsequently analyse and model the current process. You should map the current process, including relevant analysis and include a discussion around the ‘AS-IS’, this should identify the main problem with the current process.
Task 3: Process Redesign and Modelling (LO2, LO3)
Discuss and model two (2) options for process redesign for the chosen business process. The relevant analysis/modelling diagrams should draw from Task 2 and show a clear improvement to the current process as you create two possible ‘TO-BE’ states for the organisation. You should include the benefits and challenges these process changes will bring to the organisation and provide the reader with an understanding of the organisation’s viable options and a justified recommendation.
Task 4: Process Implementation (LO4)
Please see the suggested assignment structure:
1- Coversheet
2- Introduction (Approximately 125 words)
3- Main body
3.1 - Process improvement / Lean management (Approximately 500 words)
a. Critically Evaluate 3 concepts
3.2 - Process Analysis and Modelling (Approximately 500 words)
a) The customer perspective
b) Current process map
c) Discuss the “AS-IS”
3.3 - Process Redesign and Modelling (Approximately 625 words)
a) Two options for process redesign
b) Demonstrate a clear improvement
c) Benefits and challenges of new processes
d) Identify viable options for the organisation
3.4 - Process Implementation (Approximately 625 words)
a) Recommend implementation and process management
b) Evaluate the suitability of the Agile project methodology
c) Make recommendations for the suitable implementation considering the project life cycle
d) Limitations of the new process
4- Conclusion (Approximately 125 words)
Please refer to the marking criteria (below) for a breakdown of how the tasks will be marked. Please follow the Reference Link on the Library front page, which will take you through to the guide – ULaw Harvard (APA 7th).
Assessment Criteria
|
GRADE DESCRIPTORS MARKING CRITERIA |
Mark
Weight |
FAIL (0 -
49%)
|
PASS (50 –
59%) |
COMMENDATION (60 –
69%) |
DISTINCTION (70-100%) |
|
Exhibits an unsatisfactory grasp of
the issues. Primarily descriptive and lacking in independent critical
thought. Weak or no attempt at
analysis, synthesis and critical reflection. Little evidence of ability to
tackle the issues. Poor structure/grammar/ |
Satisfactory grasp of the issues,
with limited independent critical thought appropriate to the tasks. Material
is largely relevant to the tasks. Some evidence of analysis, synthesis and
critical reflection. Work is presented in acceptable manner, with some minor
errors. |
Good/very good understanding of the
issue with some independent critical thought and approach to the tasks. Good attempt at analysis, synthesis and
critical reflection, with evidence of some ability to tackle issues. Work is
clearly presented in a fairly well organised manner. |
Excellent level of understanding. All requirements are dealt with to a
high standard. Excellent analysis, synthesis and critical reflection.
Evidence of independent and original judgement in relation to resolution of
problems Excellently presented. |
||
|
Task
1: (20%) Principles of Lean Management (LO1; LO5) The
student has shown knowledge in a range of lean concepts whilst applying them
to a selected organisation. You must ensure, where appropriate, academic
citations and references are used. |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
Task 2: (20%) Process Analysis and Modelling (LO2, LO3) The
student has scoped the current process with clear analysis and modelling
throughout. Expansive evidence of wider reading and supporting information is
provided. You must ensure, where appropriate, academic citations and
references are used. |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
Task 3: (25%) Process Redesign and Modelling (LO2, LO3) The
student has discussed alternatives when making comparisons. Simultaneously
they have provided justification of the selected alternatives which has clear
analysis and modelling throughout. Expansive
evidence of wider reading and supporting information is provided. You must
ensure, where appropriate, academic citations and references are used. |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
Task 4: (25%) Process Implementation (LO4) The
student has discussed the process implementation approach using Agile project
management as a lean improvement methodology with consideration for managing
agility clearly contextualised in the chosen organisation. You must ensure,
where appropriate, academic citations and references are used. |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
Presentation and Style 10% (LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4, LO5) A well-presented report that contains all key elements;
including an introduction and conclusion. Wide range of relevant literature using
ULaw Harvard referencing to critically inform argument. |
10 |
|
|
|
|