TCHR3004 LEADERSHIP AND ADVOCACY IN EARLY CHILDHOOD Assessment One: Report Assessment Brief Assessment name: Report

TCHR3004 LEADERSHIP AND ADVOCACY IN
EARLY CHILDHOOD

Assessment One: Report
Assessment Brief

Assessment name: Report
Due Date: Monday 24th March 2025 @11:59pm (Week 3)
Weighting: 50% of final grade
Length: 1500 words (10% leeway above and below)
Unit Learning
Outcomes
You will demonstrate the following Unit Learning Outcomes on the successful completion
of this task:
1. Demonstrate knowledge of the key principles of leadership and management in
practice in early childhood education and care services and settings underpinned
by theoretical and practical perspectives on administration, management and
leadership.
2. Demonstrate an understanding of how to build supportive and collaborative
environments for children, parents, community and staff.
Task Description: For this assessment, you are required to write a report of 1500 words. The report can
include tables, charts, figures, and/or graphs to illustrate your findings where necessary.

Write a report that responds to the following three tasks.
1. Identify and explain the key principles of a (one) leadership style that you aspire to follow
and give some examples of how you aim to enact this leadership style in practice (when you
are a qualified ECT).
2. Demonstrate your knowledge of the theoretical underpinnings of this leadership style.
3. Critically review how this leadership style influences management in an early childhood
setting in relation to children, families, staff and the community.

The report must include:
1. A brief introduction of no more than 100 words outlining the purpose and content
if the report.
2. A body of no more than 1320 words and broken into sections with short,
appropriate headings (based upon the 3 tasks listed above).
3. A conclusion of no more than 80 words, highlighting the key findings.
4. A reference list that includes all sources of information used.

Rationale As an early childhood educator, it is important you have an understanding about leadership
and your role as a leader.
Referencing APA 7th referencing format is required in Faculty of Education assessment tasks – link to
SCU Libguide here: APA 7 Referencing.

A minimum of 10 references must be included in this assessment task, including the unit
material and MyReadings, National Quality Standard and the Early Years Learning
Framework (V2.0).

Support Resources Academic Integrity – SCU guidelines
Learning Zone – workshops, Quick Guides, videos, study hub
Submission of your assessment is via TURNITIN. The submission link can be found in
the Assessment Tasks and Submission Tab in the TCHR3004 Blackboard site.

Please note:
• It is YOUR responsibility to ensure that you have submitted the correct file and
the FINAL version of your assessment for marking BEFORE the due date/time.
• After you have followed the TurnItin submission it is essential you download the
Digital Receipt.
• If you have any difficulty submitting your assignment, please contact
Technology Services and make sure that you log a job with them so you have
evidence of your attempted submission. To avoid any last-minute problems,
make sure you submit well before 11:59pm on the due date.
• As per SCU Rules Relating to Awards - Rule 3 - Coursework Awards - Student
Assessment and Examinations: Section 6 - Assessment Resubmission, there are
NO resubmissions for this unit.

Late
Submission/Extension
If you need to apply for special consideration you may do so HERE

If your special consideration application is approved you will need to include a copy of the
approval in your assessment task.

According to SCU Policy, late penalties apply. More information found HERE
Academic Integrity

At Southern Cross University academic integrity means behaving with the values ​​of honesty, fairness,
trustworthiness, courage, responsibility and respect in relation to academic work.
The Southern Cross University Academic Integrity Framework aims to develop a holistic, systematic and consistent
approach to addressing academic integrity across the entire University.
For more information see the SCU Academic Integrity Framework

GenAI May be Used

Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) tools, such as Grammarly Premium, may be used for this Assessment
Task. If you use GenAI tools, you must use these ethically and acknowledge their use. To find out how to reference
GenAI in your work consult the referencing style for your unit via SCU Library referencing guides and the Student
Learning Zone Guide Quick on Acknowledging and referencing GenAI. If you use GenAI tools without
acknowledgment it may result in an academic integrity breach against you as described in the Student Academic and
Non-Academic Misconduct Rules, Section 3.

You may use Grammarly Premium to provide feedback and suggestions on your writing for academic tone, written
expression, grammar, Australian English spelling, and punctuation. You must not use GenAI to generate ideas for this
assessment task. If you choose to use these tools, you must include an appendix to demonstrate your work prior to using
GenAI . Criteria High Distinction+ High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Fail Identification and explanation of the key principles of a leadership style that you aspire to follow 20% Achieves all the criteria for a high distinction to an exemplary standard, without any errors. Outstanding identification and explanation of the key principles of a leadership style that you aspire to follow . Identification and explanation of the key principles of a leadership style that you aspire to follow is articulated very well. leadership style that you provide examples of how you aim to enact this leadership style in practice 20 % Achieves all the criteria for a high distinction to an example standard, without any errors. Outstanding examples of how you will enact this leadership style in practice Very good examples of how you will enact this leadership style in practice. Good examples of how you will enact this leadership style in practice Satisfactory examples of how you will enact this leadership style in practice Unsatisfactory examples of how you will enact this

leadership style in practice
Knowledge of the
theoretical underpinnings
of this leadership style
20%
Achieves all the criteria
for a high distinction to
an exemplary standard,
without any errors.
Outstanding
demonstration of
knowledge of the
theoretical underpinnings of this leadership style
. Knowledge of the
theoretical underpinnings
of this leadership style has been clearly identified and articulated very well . Unsatisfactory knowledge of the theoretical underpinnings of this leadership style has been demonstrated. Critical review of how this leadership style influences management in an early childhood setting in relation to children , families, staff and community . 20 % Achieves all the criteria for a high distinction to an exemplary standard, without any errors . children, families and staff Unsatisfactory critical review of how this leadership style influences management in an early childhood setting in relation to children and families has been demonstrated . Unsatisfactory critical review of how this leadership style influences management in an early childhood setting in relation to children, families, staff and community has been demonstrated .

Links to the literature on
leadership, the EYLF
(AGDE, 2022) and NQS
(ACECQA, 2020)
10%
Achieves all the criteria
for a high distinction to
an exemplary standard,
without any errors. Outstanding
links made to
the literature on leadership, the EYLF
and
NQS. Clear links to the literature on leadership, the EYLF and NQS have been made. Satisfactory links made to the literature, EYLF and NQS. Unsatisfactory or no links have been made to the literature, EYLF and NQS. Standard of writing and presentation - spelling, punctuation, grammar, paragraph structure, APA 7th referencing style 10% Achieves all the criteria for a high distinction to an example standard, without any errors. Outstanding standard of academic writing including APA 7. No errors evident. Very good use of academic writing and APA 7 referencing. No errors evident. Clear and correct use of academic writing and APA 7 referencing. No errors evident . Academic writing and APA 7 referencing is mostly correct. Very minor errors are evident. Poor academic writing including APA 7 referencing. Errors are present. knowledge. The student's performance could be described as outstanding in relation to the learning requirements specified. Distinction: The student's performance, in addition to satisfying all of the basic learning requirements, demonstrates distinctive insight and ability in researching, analyzing and applying relevant skills and concepts, and shows a well-ability developed to synthesizee, integrate and evaluate knowledge. Credit :

The student's performance, in addition to satisfying all of the basic learning requirements specified, demonstrates insight and ability in researching
, analyzing and applying relevant skills and concepts . performance fails to satisfy the learnin