TCHR5003: PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICES IN EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION ASSESSMENT 2: Report Summary
TCHR5003: PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICES IN EARLY
CHILDHOOD EDUCATION ASSESSMENT 2: Report
Summary
|
Title |
Assessment
2: Report |
||||||
|
Due Date |
Friday
12th April 11:59pm AEDT (Week 6) |
||||||
|
Length |
2000
words |
||||||
|
Weighting |
50% |
||||||
|
Submission |
1
word document submitted to Turnitin |
||||||
|
Academic Integrity (See below for limits of use
where GenAI is permitted) |
Generative
Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) tools, such as ChatGPT, may not be used for
this Assessment Task. You are required to demonstrate if you have developed
the unit’s skills and knowledge without the support of GenAI. If you use
GenAI tools in your assessment task, it may result in an academic integrity
breach against you as described in the Student Academic and NonAcademic
Misconduct Rules, Section 3. |
||||||
|
|
Under the Rules - Student Academic and Non-Academic Misconduct |
||||||
|
Rules (Section
3) students have the right to Appeal against the Academi |
c |
||||||
|
Integrity
Officers academic misconduct Determination, to the Executive |
|||||||
|
Dean, with that determination being
final and conclusive, and not subject to |
|
||||||
|
further Appeal
within the University. Students are
not able to appeal against |
|
||||||
|
academic
misconduct via the Unit Assessor or unit staff. |
|
||||||
|
Unit Learning
Outcomes |
You will demonstrate the
following Unit Learning Outcomes on the successful completion of this
task: •
ULO 3: Develop the knowledge and skills
regarding setting up learning environments for children that are flexible and
sustainable both indoors and outdoors. •
ULO 4: Reflect upon, and critique the holistic
approaches of principles and practices. |
||||||
Task Description
This task requires you to reflect upon the Early Years Learning Framework [EYLF] (AGDE, 2022) principles and practices and write a report demonstrating your ability to identify and critique highquality early childhood pedagogy.
Rationale
Early childhood educators are required to understand the importance of high-quality practice and be able to identify what high-quality practice looks like. In this assessment, you will be asked to identify high-quality practice and determine the principles, theory and research that underpins such practice. This assessment aims to develop your understanding of how to align practice, principles, theory and research.
Task Instructions
The Early Years Learning Framework (EYLF) is a crucial document for early childhood education and care. You are to write a report that demonstrates your knowledge and understanding of how the EYLF principles and practices support high-quality pedagogy.
Your critical reflection should be written in an essay that critically analyses three EYLF Principles (two of which are Respect for diversity AND Sustainability; and one is your choice), and three EYLF Practices (two of which are Responsiveness to children AND Learning environments; and one is your choice). As part of your critical analysis, you will include your personal reflections on how you anticipate implementing these three principles and three practices, in high-quality early childhood education and care settings, to support best practice.
Your report should include an introduction that explains how the EYLF guides high-quality pedagogy, body paragraphs and a conclusion, with in-text citations and references to academic literature to support your perspectives.
The EYLF Principles and Practices that you can choose from are listed below (the compulsory principles and practices are in bold):
PRINCIPLES:
- Secure, respectful and reciprocal relationships
- Partnerships
- Respect for diversity (compulsory)
- Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander perspectives
- Equity, inclusion and high expectations
- Sustainability (compulsory)
- Critical reflection and ongoing professional learning - Collaborative leadership and teamwork
PRACTICES:
- Holistic, integrated and interconnected approaches
- Responsiveness to children (compulsory)
- Play-based learning and intentionality
- Learning environments (compulsory)
- Cultural responsiveness
- Continuity of learning and transitions
- Assessment and evaluation for learning, development and wellbeing
Follow the steps below to complete this task:
• Create a new Word Document and save it with your surname and initial and the assessment task’s name. E.g: MillsA_TCHR5003_assessment2_report
• Create a cover page with the following details:
o Student name o Student ID o Unit code
o Unit Assessor and Tutor names o Date submitted
• Complete one reference list for the entire assessment task.
• Once complete, submit task via the Turnitin link in the Assessment and Submission section of the unit site.
• Adhere to APA7 formatting guidelines
Referencing
APA7th referencing format is required with a minimum of 10 references. Sources should include relevant early childhood policy and peer-reviewed literature. Link to SCU Libguide here: APA 7 Referencing.
Task Submission
Assessments should be submitted using the Turnitin activity titled “Assessment 2: Report” in the Assessments Tasks & Submission section on the Blackboard site. Only Microsoft Word documents submitted via the Turnitin portal on Blackboard will be accepted.
Special Consideration
Students wishing to request special consideration to extend the due date of an assessment task must submit a Request for Special Consideration form via their MyEnrolment page as early as possible and prior to the original due date for that assessment task, along with any accompanying documents, such as medical certificates.
Late Submissions & Penalties
Except when special consideration is awarded, late submission of assessment tasks will lead automatically to the imposition of a penalty. Penalties will be incurred as soon as the deadline is reached.
• a penalty of 5% of the available marks will be deducted from the actual mark at one minute after the time listed in the due date
• a further penalty of 5% of the available mark will be deducted from the actual mark achieved on each subsequent calendar day until the mark reaches zero.”
Grades & Feedback
Assignments that have been submitted by the due date will receive an SCU grade and written feedback. Grades and feedback will be posted to “Grades & Feedback” section on the Blackboard unit site. Please allow 7-10 days for marks to be posted.
Academic Integrity
At Southern Cross University academic integrity means behaving with the values of honesty, fairness, trustworthiness, courage, responsibility and respect in relation to academic work. The Southern Cross University Academic Integrity Framework aims to develop a holistic, systematic and consistent approach to addressing academic integrity across the entire University. For more information see the SCU Academic Integrity Framework
GenAI May Not be Used
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) tools, such as ChatGPT, may not be used for this Assessment Task. You are required to demonstrate if you have developed the unit’s skills and knowledge without the support of GenAI. If you use GenAI tools in your assessment task, it may result in an academic integrity breach against you as described in the Student Academic and NonAcademic Misconduct Rules, Section 3.
Assessment Rubric
|
Marking
Criteria and % allocation |
High Distinction + (100%) |
High Distinction (85–99%) |
Distinction (75–84%) |
Credit (65–
74%) |
Pass (50–64%) |
Marginal Fail
(35-49%) |
Fail (1-34%) |
Not Addressed (0%) |
|
Explanation of how the
EYLF guides early childhood education and care pedagogy. 10 marks |
Achieves
all the criteria for a high distinction to an exemplary standard, without any
errors. |
Outstanding explanation of how the EYLF guides early childhood
education and care pedagogy. |
Very good explanation of how the EYLF guides early childhood
education and care pedagogy. |
Good explanation of how the EYLF guides early childhood
education and care pedagogy. |
Satisfactory explanation of how the EYLF guides early childhood
education and care pedagogy. |
Poor explanation of how the EYLF guides early childhood
education and care pedagogy. |
No explanation of how the EYLF guides early childhood
education and care pedagogy. |
|
|
Identification, examples
and analysis of highquality ECEC Principles 15 marks |
Achieves all the criteria
for a high distinction
to an exemplary standard, without any errors. |
Outstanding detail, examples and analysis
regarding the identification of high-quality principles. |
Very good detail,
examples and analysis regarding the identification of high-quality
principles. |
Good detail, examples and analysis regarding the identification
of high-quality principles. |
Satisfactory detail, examples and analysis regarding the
identification of high-quality principles. |
Inadequate detail, examples and analysis regarding the
identification of high-quality principles. |
No detail, examples or analysis regarding the identification
of high-quality principles. |
|
|
Identification, examples
and analysis of highquality ECEC Practices 15 marks |
Achieves
all the criteria for a high distinction to an exemplary standard, without any
errors. |
Outstanding detail, examples and analysis regarding the
identification of high-quality practices.
|
Very good detail,
examples and analysis regarding the identification of high-quality practices. |
Good detail, examples and analysis regarding the identification
of high-quality practices. |
Satisfactory detail, examples and analysis
regarding the identification of high-quality practices. |
Inadequate detail, examples and analysis
regarding the identification of high-quality practices. |
No detail, examples or analysis
regarding the identification of high-quality practices. |
|
|
Use of unit materials and
relevant early childhood literature. |
Achieves all the criteria
for a high distinction
to an exemplary standard, without any errors. |
Outstanding reference to relevant unit
materials and early childhood literature.
|
Very good reference to relevant unit materials and early childhood
literature. |
Good reference to relevant unit
materials and early childhood literature.
|
Satisfactory reference to relevant unit
materials and early childhood literature.
|
Inadequate reference to relevant unit
materials and early childhood literature.
|
No reference to relevant unit
materials and early childhood literature. |
|
|
5 marks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Academic Literacy 5 marks |
Achieves all the criteria for a high distinction to an
exemplary standard, without any errors. |
Demonstrates a
comprehensive understanding and application of correct writing conventions,
including accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation. The reference list contains all
the required information in the correct APA 7 format. |
Demonstrates a thorough
understanding and application of correct writing conventions by correctly
using spelling, grammar, and punctuation throughout with very minor inaccuracies.
The reference list contains all the required information in the correct APA 7
format, with very minor errors. |
Demonstrates a good
understanding and application of correct writing conventions by correctly
using spelling, grammar, and punctuation,
with minor inaccuracies. The
reference list contains all the required information, but some items may be
in an incorrect format or have more than five minor errors. |
Demonstrates a satisfactory understanding and application
of correct writing conventions by mostly using correct spelling, grammar, and
punctuation, with some inaccuracies. The reference list provides most of the
required information, but there are some errors. |
Poor understanding and application of correct writing conventions,
including accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation that impact
readability. The reference list is incorrectly formatted or there are an
inadequate number of references. |
Poor understanding and
application of correct writing conventions, including accurate spelling,
grammar, and punctuation, that significantly impact readability. The reference
list is incomplete or missing. |
|
Description of SCU Grades
High Distinction:
The student’s performance, in addition to satisfying all of the basic learning requirements, demonstrates distinctive insight and ability in researching, analysing and applying relevant skills and concepts, and shows exceptional ability to synthesise, integrate and evaluate knowledge. The student’s performance could be described as outstanding in relation to the learning requirements specified.
Distinction:
The student’s performance, in addition to satisfying all of the basic learning requirements, demonstrates distinctive insight and ability in researching, analysing and applying relevant skills and concepts, and shows a well-developed ability to synthesise, integrate and evaluate knowledge. The student’s performance could be described as distinguished in relation to the learning requirements specified.
Credit:
The student’s performance, in addition to satisfying all of the basic learning requirements specified, demonstrates insight and ability in researching, analysing and applying relevant skills and concepts. The student’s performance could be described as competent in relation to the learning requirements specified.
Pass:
The student’s performance satisfies all of the basic learning requirements specified and provides a sound basis for proceeding to higher-level studies in the subject area. The student’s performance could be described as satisfactory in relation to the learning requirements specified.
Fail:
The student’s performance fails to satisfy the learning requirements specified.