The Nurse Leader as Knowledge Worker The term “knowledge worker” was first coined by management consultant and author Peter Drucker in his book, The Landmarks of Tomorrow  (1959). Drucker defined knowledge workers

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelop a 5- to 6-slide PowerPoint presentation that addresses the following:· Explain the concept of a knowledge worker.· Define and explain nursing informatics.

25 to >22.0 ptsExcellentAbly synthesize the literature and course resources to present a clear and accurate explanation of the 2 concepts....The presentation clearly and accurately explains the concept of a knowledge worker....The presentation clearly and accurately defines and explains nursing informatics.

22 to >19.0 ptsGoodSummarize the literature and course resources to present a clear and accurate explanation of the 2 concepts....The presentation explains the concept of a knowledge worker. ...The presentation defines and explains nursing informatics.

19 to >17.0 ptsFairThe presentation is missing one of the concepts or one of the concepts is superficially addressed.

17 to >0 ptsPoorThe presentation is missing two concepts or the concepts are superficially addressed.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelop a graphic visual representation of the role of the nurse leader as a knowledge worker. On the slide, include an explanation of the role.

15 to >13.0 ptsExcellentThe presentation includes a detailed graphic and explanation of the role of the nurse leader as a knowledge worker.

13 to >11.0 ptsGoodThe presentation includes a graphic and an adequate explanation of the role of the nurse leader as a knowledge worker.

11 to >10.0 ptsFairThe presentation includes a graphic, yet the explanation of the role is not addressed or is superficially addressed.

10 to >0 ptsPoorThe presentation is missing a graphic, an explanation of the role, or both the graphic and explanation of the role are missing.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresent the hypothetical scenario you originally shared in the Discussion Forum. Include your examination of the data you could use, how the data might be accessed/collected, and what knowledge might be derived from the data. Be sure to incorporate feedback received from your colleagues' replies.

35 to >31.0 ptsExcellentThe presentation clearly and thoroughly includes the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum, including a detailed and accurate examination of the data used, how the data might be accessed/collected, and the knowledge that could be derived from the data. ...The presentation incorporates peer feedback.

31 to >27.0 ptsGoodThe presentation includes the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum, including an accurate examination of the data used, how the data might be accessed/collected, and the knowledge that could be derived from the data. ...The presentation incorporates peer feedback.

27 to >24.0 ptsFairThe presentation includes the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum; one or two of the criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.

24 to >0 ptsPoorThe presentation is missing the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum or three or more of the criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.

35 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePowerPoint presentation:The presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.

5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentThe presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.

4 to >3.0 ptsGoodEighty percent of the presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.

3 to >2.0 ptsFairSixty to seventy nine percent of the presentation follows these guidelines: presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.

2 to >0 ptsPoorLess than sixty percent of the presentation follows these guidelines: presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResources

10 to >8.0 ptsExcellentPresentation includes: 3 or more peer-reviewed articles and 2 or more course resources.

8 to >7.0 ptsGoodPresentation includes: 2 peer-reviewed articles and 2 course resources.

7 to >6.0 ptsFairPresentation includes: 1 peer-reviewed article and 1 course resource.

6 to >0 ptsPoorPresentation includes: 1 or no resources.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - English writing standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.5 ptsGoodContains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3.5 to >3.0 ptsFairContains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – APA:The reference list and image attribution list follow correct APA format

5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentUses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.5 ptsGoodContains a few (1-2) APA format errors.

3.5 to >3.0 ptsFairContains several (3-4) APA format errors.

3 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

5 pts