The project plan has word limit of 2,000 and should be supported with recent literature. The reference list is not included in the word count. In-text citations will be included in the word count. If you exceed the word limit by more

Weight:

35%

Type of Collaboration:

Individual

Due:

Monday 14th September 2026, 23:59 hrs

Submission:

Submission via Turnitin in ULTRA

Format:

Project Plan

Length:

2,000 words

Use of Artificial Intelligence:

In this assessment task, you will not be able to meet the learning outcomes related to this assessment by using generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools. Working with another person or technology in order to gain an unfair advantage in assessment or improperly obtaining answers from a third party including generative AI to questions in an examination or other form of assessment may lead to sanctions under the Student Misconduct Rule. Use of generative AI tools may be detected. More information is available on the Library Webpage.

Criteria

High Distinction

Distinction

Credit

Pass

Unsatisfactory

Introduction,

Background, Aims,

Objectives,

Outcomes, Plan (30)

Exceptionally appropriate, clear, and concise framing of the project statement and describes the scope of the project.

Included  SMART

innovative goals- each goal is clearly explained.(30-25.5)

Very good, clear, and concise framing of the project, describes the scope of the project.

Included SMART goals that are innovative - each goal is explained in detail.

(25-22.5)

Good framing of the project statement and describes the scope of the project to some extent.

Included SMART

goals  and each goal is explained in detail.

(22-19.5)

Identifies the project statement and states the scope of the

project. Included SMART goals and each goal is explained. (19-15)

The project plan and scope is vague, unclear or poorly written. Inadequate, absence or poor use of the SMART goals. Lack of explanation of each goal. (≤ 14.5)

Methods,

Interventions, Steps,

Justifications,

Resources (30)

Exceptionally logical,

comprehensive, and coherent description of work breakdown, resources required. Exceptionally thoughtful and realistic timeline incorporates all necessary tasks for project completion.

(30-25.5)

Superior

explanation of work breakdown, resources required and risk management plan. Provides relevant and realistic timeline for project completion. (25-22.5)

Adequate explanation of work breakdown, resources required and risk management plan. Realistic timeline for project completion. (22-19.5)

Good explanation of work breakdown, resources required and risk management plan. Realistic timeline for project completion.

(19-15)

Poor explanation of work breakdown, resources required and risk management plan. Poor identification of timeline for project completion.

(≤14.5)

Timeline, Risk

Management

Plan, reflection and Framework

.(30)

Comprehensive

description of the risk management plan, timeline, design or framework that is being used for this project with a clear reflection and description on how the feedback and framework shaped the project.(30-25.5)

Deatiled and coherent description of the risk management plan, timeline, design or framework that is being used for this project with a clear reflection and description on how the feedback and framework shaped the project.(25-22.5)

Generally logical and coherent description of the risk management plan, timeline, design or framework that is being used for this project with a clear reflection and description on how the feedback and framework shaped the project.(22-19.5)

Describes the risk management plan, timeline, design or framework that is being used for this project with a clear reflection and description on how the feedback and framework shaped the project with gaps and lacking details or unachievable.

(19-15)

Inadequate description of the risk management plan, timeline, design or framework that is being used for this project with a clear reflection and description on how the feedback and framework shaped the project.

(≤14.5)

Academic writing and

referencing skills.(10)

There are no spelling or grammatical errors. Referencing is accurate and formatted according to the APA 7th Style Guide.

(10-8.5)

There are 1-2 minor spelling or grammatical errors. Referencing is accurate and formatted according to the APA 7th Style Guide. (8-7.5)

Minimal spelling or grammatical errors. Referencing is mostly accurate and formatted according to the APA 7th Style Guide. (7-6.5)

There are several spelling or grammatical errors. Referencing is mostly accurate and formatted according to the APA 7th Style Guide. (6-5)

There are consistent spelling and/or grammatical errors. Referencing is not accurate and/or not formatted according to the APA 7th Style Guide. (≤4.5)