This short reflection video is designed to give you low-pressure practice in public speaking while allowing you to think critically about your experience debating the AI tool. Public
Assignment: AI Debate Reflection Video
Purpose
This short reflection video is designed to give you low-pressure practice in public speaking while allowing you to think critically about your experience debating the AI tool. Public speaking is a skill that improves with practice. The more you do it in informal settings, the more confident you will feel in formal ones.
This assignment is not about being polished or perfect. It is about showing up, speaking naturally, and reflecting honestly.
What You Will Do
- After completing your AI debate in Week 9, record a short 3–5 minute video reflecting on your experience.
- Speak informally, as if you are talking to a classmate or friend about what you just did. No need to script it word-for-word.
- Upload your video to the Week 10 “Debate Video Reflection” assignment.
Reflection Prompts
Use the following guiding questions to shape your reflection.
- How did debating an AI tool affect your confidence or comfort level as a communicator and critical thinker? How did it feel to argue against a “non-human” opponent compared to how you would expect a peer debate to go?
- What did this experience teach you about your own communication or argument style? Did the AI bring up anything that surprised you or made you think differently?
- How might this debate influence the way you approach future discussions or presentations?
Video Reflection Tips
- 3–5 minutes in length
- Keep it informal and conversational. Imagine you are talking to someone who is curious about your experience.
- You do not need a fancy setup. Record on your phone, laptop, or any device with a camera. A quiet space is helpful, but perfection is not required.
- Try to speak naturally without reading directly from notes. It is fine to glance at your guiding questions but let your personality and true reflections on your debate come through.
- Review the rubric in detail to see the areas in which you are being graded. Be sure to address your debate content and what you learned from the experience.
Rubric
AI Debate Reflection Video Rubric
|
AI Debate Reflection Video Rubric |
||
|
Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCompletion
& Length |
15 to >13.0 ptsExcellentVideo is 3–5
minutes and fully complete. 13 to >10.0 ptsProficientVideo is
slightly under time but complete. 10 to >7.0 ptsSatisfactoryVideo is
noticeably short. 7 to >4.0 ptsDevelopingVideo is
incomplete or only 1–2 minutes. 4 to >0 ptsMissingNo video submitted
or video under 1 minute. |
15 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflection
on Debate Content & Argumentation |
20 to >16.0 ptsExcellentClearly
explains what was challenging, surprising, or engaging in the debate;
references specific moments or exchanges. 16 to >12.0 ptsProficientIdentifies
challenges or insights with some detail. 12 to >9.0 ptsSatisfactoryMentions
challenges or insights in general terms only. 9 to >5.0 ptsDevelopingMinimal or
unclear discussion of debate experience. 5 to >0 ptsMissingNo reflection on
debate content. |
20 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePrompt
Adherence |
10 to >8.0 ptsExcellentResponds
thoughtfully to at least 3 prompts; shows clear personal insight and genuine
engagement. 8 to >6.0 ptsProficientResponds to at
least 3 prompts with some insight; mostly thoughtful. 6 to >4.0 ptsSatisfactoryResponds to 2
prompts, with limited detail or surface-level insight. 4 to >2.0 ptsDevelopingResponds
minimally to prompts; little reflection. 2 to >0 ptsMissingNo real reflection
present. |
10 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrowth &
Takeaways |
10 to >8.0 ptsExcellentExplains how
the experience affected their confidence, communication approach, and/or
future speaking goals. Reflection feels authentic and personal. 8 to >6.0 ptsProficientIdentifies at
least one takeaway related to communication or learning. 6 to >4.0 ptsSatisfactoryMentions
takeaway(s) vaguely without elaboration. 4 to >2.0 ptsDevelopingLimited or
unclear description of growth or lessons learned. 2 to >0 ptsMissingNo mention of
personal growth. |
10 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning
OutcomeCommunication & Effort |
20 to >16.0 ptsExcellentSpeaks in a
clear, conversational, and natural way that shows genuine effort. Does not
need to be polished but still feels authentic. 16 to >12.0 ptsProficientSpeaks
clearly most of the time; shows effort to be conversational even if a little
scripted. 12 to >9.0 ptsSatisfactoryUnderstandable
but uneven; relies too heavily on notes or feels rushed. 9 to >5.0 ptsDevelopingHard to follow
due to low effort, mumbling, or unclear delivery. 5 to >0 ptsMissingNo real attempt at
communication or video missing. |
20 pts |
Total Points: 75
