(Untitled)
7HURM025W PG HR Analytics Assessment 2 Brief 2024-25 | UoW
Published: 19 Jun, 2025
| Category | Assignment | Subject | Management |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | University of Westminster | Module Title | 7HURM025W PG HR Analytics |
| Assessment Title | Report |
| Assessment Format | Report |
| Assessment Deadline | 7 July 2025 |
| Date and form of Feedback | 29 July 2025 |
| Word Limit | 2000 words |
7HURM025W The Assessment
Application of the HRA method to tackle an HR issue affecting a selected organisation
Propose an HRA method to address the people management challenge at an organisation of your choice. Consider how HR practice(s) could benefit from and be improved by the proposed approach, taking into consideration the characteristics of the organisation. Critically discuss and justify your proposition, including the ethical aspects that must be considered.
Draw heavily on academic knowledge and evidence. The report should be referenced throughout.
Word limit: 2000 words + executive summary & references
Suggested content:
Executive summary – summarises your report, including the main conclusions
Introduction - contextual information and outline of the report
Discussion of the organisation and of the issue – characteristics of the organisation, importance of the issue, potential impact on the organisation, benefits stemming from overcoming the issue
Outline of the proposed method, including its strengths and weaknesses, impact on HR practice(s) and addressing the issue
Critical evaluation of the proposed approach – feasibility, different stakeholders’ perspectives and potential response, ethical challenges
7HURM025W Learning Outcomes Addressed:
1. Evaluate the suitability of various HR analytics methods to address particular organisational challenges
4. Design workforce analytics interventions to address HR and people management challenges
5. Critically review the impact of HR analytics on organisational practice and stakeholders
6. Contribute to building organisational analytics culture
7HURM025W Assessment Criteria
The assessment criteria and weightings show you what is important in the assessment and how marks are shared across each criterion. When you are completing your assessment, remember you need to fulfil the brief and the assessment criteria below.
Criterion | Weighting |
Clear structure, presentation & focus on the task | 20% |
Knowledge & understanding of the method | 20% |
Use of reliable literature & evidence to underpin the report | 30% |
Critical evaluation and consideration of ethics | 30% |
Do You Need 7HURM025W Assignment for This Question
Order Non-Plagiarised Assignment
Assessment 2 Marking Turnitin Rubric
Criteria & weighting | Fail (below 50) | Pass (50-59) | Merit (60-69) | Distinction (70+) |
Clear structure, presentation & focus on the task (20% of total mark) | Report structure is not adhered to well. Frequent lapses in clarity. Executive summary is not written effectively, vital information is missing. Referencing requires improvement. Loose focus on the set task. Some relevant content but cursory and/or incoherent to address the set task. | Adequate report structure. Executive summary could be more informative. Suitably referenced although minor slips might have occurred. Relevant content and ideas, largely well focused on the task. Minor lapses evidenced by lack of coherence. | Appropriate report structure. Informative executive summary. Well referenced throughout. Competent content appropriate to address the set task. Presented ideas are relevant to the answer. | Excellent report structure. Clear organization and natural flow. Succinctly written but packed with important information executive summary. Perfect referencing in the text and in the reference list. Excellent focus and material fully relevant to the set task. Fully coherent answer. |
Knowledge & understanding of the method (20% of the total mark) | Knowledge and understanding of the proposed method is minimalist or incomplete. It is not clear how the proposed method is appropriate to address the organisational challenge. | Knowledge and understanding of the proposed method is mostly evident, but lacks clarity or detail at some points, hampering exact application to the organisational issue. | Knowledge and understanding of the proposed method is fully evident. Well-developed discussion of the appropriateness of the method to address the organisational challenge. | Knowledge and understanding of the proposed method is clear, complete and efficient/to-the-point. Robust justification how the method is appropriate to address organisational issue. |
Use of reliable literature & evidence to underpin the report (30% of the total mark) | Limited use of reliable literature and evidence to underpin the report. Limited or poor evidence of research and reading. | Some evidence of research and reading but may be over reliant on limited range of sources. Draws together some of the key evidence to support the answer. | Evidence of independent literature search. Draws on evidence effectively with the use of wide range of sources. Strong use of relevant theoretical and empirical material to underpin the report. | Evidence of extensive literature search. Detailed and sophisticated use of evidence backed up with relevant references. Uses theoretical and empirical material to offer original insights and develop an interesting answer. |
Critical evaluation and consideration of ethics (30% of the total mark) | Limited or unclear attempt at critical evaluation of the proposed approach which might require further thought on practical and ethical implications. | Sensible attempt at critical evaluation of the proposed approach which somewhat addressed practical and ethical aspects. | Appropriate critical evaluation of the proposed approach which clearly explains practical and ethical implications. | In-depth critical evaluation of the proposed approach which covers in good detail practical and ethical aspects. |
Anonymous Marking
Do NOT include your name or student number within the file name or anywhere within your submission. The submission will be subject to anonymous marking. Having logged into Blackboard, the system will record your details anonymously, and tutors will only see your name after the entire submission has been assessed and provisional marks have been released to all students at the same time.
Referencing Requirements for the Assessment
Statements, assertions, and ideas made in coursework should be supported by citing relevant sources. Sources cited in the text should be listed at the end of the assignment in a reference list. Any material that you read but do not cite in the report should go into a separate bibliography. Unless explicitly stated otherwise by the module teaching team, all referencing should be in Cite Them Right referencing format.
The Deadline and Submitting Your Coursework Checks
Unless indicated otherwise, coursework is submitted via Blackboard. Remember to keep the receipt of your submission carefully, for your records.
The deadline for this assessment is 7th July 2025 at 13:00 UK time. This means that your work should be fully uploaded before 13:00. The University would treat your submission as late if your work has not been fully uploaded and stored on the server before 13:00. To avoid your submission being marked as late, we highly recommend you upload your work as soon as possible before the deadline and not wait until or just before the deadline to start uploading your work. Please note that at busy times, the coursework submission process may run slowly, and hence it is in your best interest not to leave submitting your work very close to the deadline.
Penalties for Late Submission and Advice About Mitigating Circumstances
Any assessment submitted late online will be penalised unless you submit a claim for Mitigating Circumstances (MC) and the claim is accepted by the Registry.
Coursework submitted late but within 24 hours of the original deadline will have 10 marks deducted from the original mark to a minimum of the pass mark (50% at the postgraduate level). For example, a piece of assessment awarded a mark of 70% would be reduced to 60% as a penalty for late submission. If you submit your coursework more than 24 hours late after the specified deadline, you will be given a mark of zero for the work in question unless the Mitigating Circumstances claim has been accepted officially by the Registry.
If a coursework deadline extension has been granted as a reasonable adjustment approved by Disability Learning Support, and/or a successful Mitigating Circumstances claim, the late submission penalties will be applied to the extended deadline.
If you do not submit an MC claim or if your MC claim is rejected, then your work will be penalised in line with the assessment regulations.
Difficulties in Submitting Assignments on Time
If you are having technical difficulties with submission, please email the module leader, Dr Iwona Wilkowska, on i.wilkowska@westminster.ac.uk and ask for advice.
If you have difficulties for reasons beyond your control (e.g., serious illness, family problems etc.) that prevent you from submitting the assessment, make sure you apply to the Mitigating Circumstances board with evidence to support your claim as soon as possible. Further details can be found on the following URL: University of Westminster Guides and policies
Please make sure that your message is very specific. The Service Desk will then email you confirmation that you will be able to use it as supporting written evidence for your MC claim. You should take screenshots or make short videos that capture the issue, such as the error messages on the screen, as you may use them as supporting written evidence for your MC claim.
Academic Support & Feedback Arrangements
Academic support is an important aspect of your learning within the University, on your course and in this module. Academic support is offered in different ways within each module. Below, we will explain how you should receive academic support within this module, and specific weekly academic support can be found in the module calendar.
During the lectures, time will be allocated for questions and answers about the module content, as well as the assessment within the module. We will try to keep all questions and answers about assessment within these sessions to ensure they are freely available to all on the module.
During the sessions, you will undertake hands-on activities that directly feed into this assignment. You will have the opportunity to practice the required techniques and tools, articulate ideas and discuss their relevance, raise questions and get support from your tutor. Attendance is therefore of utmost importance.
Further support and guidance are also available from the Academic Engagement and Learning Development team. For more information, please follow the link: University of Westminster Studies
Formative feedback
The module contains a formative assessment for this assignment. It takes the form of guided, structured activity according to the tasks and marking criteria. You will discuss your formative activity and receive feedback from your peers and lecturer. You should engage actively in evaluating and supporting the work of your fellow students, taking into consideration assessment tasks and marking criteria. This will assist you in developing your assignment to a high standard, but also in developing a range of transferable skills.
Summative feedback
Summative feedback will be provided for this assessment. This feedback is to help you not only understand how you performed in the assessment, but it will also provide guidance on how you can improve your academic skills for future assessments in this and other modules within your course.
Specific summative feedback will be provided online via Blackboard, and it will be available on 29 July 2025. We aim to provide you with this feedback within 15 working days.
Academic Integrity
What you submit for assessment must be your current work. It will automatically be scanned through a text-matching system to check for possible plagiarism.
Do not reuse material from other assessments that you may have completed on other modules. Collusion with other students (except when working in groups), recycling previous assignments (unless this is explicitly allowed by the module leader) and/or plagiarism (copying) of other sources, including Generative AI (unless allowed within the module), all are offences and are dealt with accordingly. Please see the detailed guidance on Academic misconduct. If you are not sure about this, then speak to your module leader.
University of Westminster Quality & Standards statement
Plagiarism is a particular form of cheating. Plagiarism must be avoided at all costs, and students who break the rules, however innocently, will be penalised. It is your responsibility to ensure that you understand correct referencing practices. As a university-level student, you are expected to use appropriate references and keep carefully detailed notes of all your sources of material, including any material downloaded from the www.
Plagiarism is defined as submission for assessment of material (written, visual or oral) originally produced by another person or persons, without acknowledgement, in such a way that the work could be assumed to be your own. Plagiarism may involve the unattributed use of another person’s work, ideas, opinions, theory, facts, statistics, graphs, models, paintings, performance, computer code, drawings, quotations of another person’s actual spoken or written words, or paraphrases of another person’s spoken or written words.
Plagiarism covers both direct copying and copying or paraphrasing with only minor adjustments:
- A direct quotation from a text must be indicated by the use of quotation marks (or an indented paragraph in italics for a substantive section) and the source of the quote (title, author, page number and date of publication) provided.
- A paraphrased summary must be indicated by attribution of the author, date and source of the material, including page numbers for the section(s) which have been summarised