Week 6 Assignment: Policy 250 Points Possible Analysis Assignment Description This assignment builds on the previous assignments in the course, where you identified a social problem and selected a local, state, or federal policy that affects
Week 6 Assignment: Policy 250 Points Possible Analysis
Assignment Description
This assignment builds on the previous assignments in the course, where you identified a social problem and selected a local, state, or federal policy that affects it.
In this assignment, you will analyze the local, state, or federal policy you chose to address your social justice issue, including providing background on the development of the policy and evaluating its effectiveness and feasibility.
Remember that the feasibility of a policy relates not only to its economic feasibility but also to its political and social impact. You will also identify the policy constraints that inhibit the policy from most effectively reaching your targeted population.
Continue to consult the United States Congress website (located in the Assignment Resources

(https://capella.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/leganto/public/01CAPELLA_INST/lists/2629702320006731?
auth=SAML§ion=2631180150006731) reading list), the Government Accountability Office, public policy analysis research and reports, and other peer-reviewed research to support your analysis.
Also, use the NASW Code of Ethics web page—located in the Assignment Resources

(https://capella.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/leganto/public/01CAPELLA_INST/lists/2629702320006731?
auth=SAML§ion=2631180150006731) reading list—to guide your analysis.
By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following CSWE EPAS competencies and practice behaviors:
CSWE EPAS Competency 5: Engage in policy practice.

C5.GP.A: Use social justice, anti-racist, and anti-oppressive lenses to assess how social welfare policies affect the delivery of and access to social services.

Related assignment criterion:
1. Analyze the development of the chosen policy.
2. Evaluate the effectiveness of the policy with respect to the target population.

3. Evaluate the feasibility of the policy.
4. Identify the policy constraints that inhibit the policy from fully addressing the problem for the chosen population.
Assignment Instructions
For this assignment:
Analyze the development of your chosen policy.

Analyze the historical background that led to the development of the policy.
Define the goals of the policy and how these goals are intended to be met, including services and programs intended to achieve the goals.
Evaluate the effectiveness of the policy with respect to the target population.

Consider how well the policy has met the needs of your target population and to what extent it improves the social justice problem you initially researched. Does the policy seem to ignore, impede, or strengthen the social functioning of the target population?
To what extent does the policy meet or improve the social values of the target population?
To what extent does the policy adhere to best practice ethics and best practice standards? If the outcome of your analysis is that best practice ethics and standards are not being adhered to, include that information in your analysis as well.
Evaluate the feasibility of the policy.


Is the policy politically, economically, and administratively feasible? Provide details and rationale.

Identify the policy constraints that inhibit the policy from fully addressing the problem for the chosen population.

Have other constraints arisen since the passage of the policy that have made conditions worse or better for the chosen population?
Guidelines


Support your claims and recommendation with clear rationale and support from scholarly, peerreviewed literature.
Review the Policy Analysis rubric for information on how your work will be graded.
Review the feedback you received for the previous assignments to improve the quality of your submission. Further feedback from this assignment will help you improve your work for the final Policy Analysis and Recommendations assignment.
Additional Requirements
The assignment you submit is expected to meet the following requirements:

Written communication: Written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message.

APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style and formatting standards.

Cited resources: A minimum of six scholarly sources. Most literature cited should be current, with publication dates within the past five years.
Length of paper: 5–7 typed, double-spaced pages.
Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.
Due date: Assignment must be submitted to your instructor in the courseroom no later than Sunday, 11:59 p.m. CST, this week.
Competencies Measured

By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and rubric criteria:

Competency 1: Use social justice, anti-racist, and anti-oppressive lenses to assess how social welfare policies affect the delivery of and access to social services. (C5.GP.A)
Analyze the development of the chosen policy. (C5.GP.A)
Evaluate the effectiveness of the policy with respect to the target population. (C5.GP.A)
Evaluate the feasibility of the policy. (C5.GP.A)

Identify the policy constraints that inhibit the policy from fully addressing the problem for the chosen population. (C5.GP.A)

Competency 3: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the social work profession.

Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the social work profession, referencing at least six scholarly sources.

View Rubric
Policy Analysis

Policy Analysis
|
Criteria |
Ratings |
|
Pts |
|
Analyze the development of the chosen policy. (C5.GP.A) |
55 to >46.75 pts 46.75 to
>38.5 DISTINGUISHED pts Analyzes the PROFICIENT development of Analyzes the the chosen development of policy and uses the chosen outstanding policy. details and examples to support the analysis. |
38.5 to >0 pts BASIC Describes but does not analyze the
development of the chosen policy. |
0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not describe the development of the chosen / 55 pts policy. |
|
Evaluate the effectiveness of the policy with respect to the
target population. (C5.GP.A) |
52.5 to >44.63 44.63 to >36.75 pts pts DISTINGUISHED
PROFICIENT Evaluates the Evaluates
the effectiveness of effectiveness of
the policy with the policy with
respect to the respect to the target target population, usingpopulation. outstanding details and examples to support the evaluation. |
36.75 to >0 pts BASIC Analyzes but does not evaluate the
effectiveness of the policy with respect to the target population. |
0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not analyze the effectiveness of the policy with respect
to the target / 52.5 pts population. |
52.5 to >44.63 44.63 to >36.75 36.75 to >0 pts 0 pts
pts pts BASIC NON_PERFORMANCE
DISTINGUISHED PROFICIENT Describes but Does not
Evaluates the Evaluates the does not describe the
Evaluate the
feasibility of the feasibility of the evaluate the feasibility of the
feasibility of the / 52.5 pts
policy, using policy. feasibility of the policy.
policy. (C5.GP.A)
outstanding policy.
details and examples as support.

|
Identify the policy constraints that inhibit the policy from
fully addressing the problem for the |
52.5 to >44.63 44.63 to >36.75 36.75 to >0 pts
0 pts / 52.5 pts pts pts BASIC NON_PERFORMANCE DISTINGUISHED PROFICIENT Identifies only Does not Analyzes the Identifies the some of the identify
policy policy policy policy constraints that constraints that constraints
that constraints that inhibit the policy inhibit the policy inhibit
the policy inhibit the policy from fully |
Policy Analysis
|
Criteria |
Ratings |
|
Pts |
|
|
chosen
population. (C5.GP.A) |
from fully from fully addressing the addressing the problem for the problem for the chosen chosen population, usingpopulation. outstanding details and examples as support. |
from fully addressing the problem for the
chosen population. |
addressing the problem for the chosen population. |
|
|
Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional,
and consistent with expectations for members of the social work profession,
referencing at least six scholarly sources. |
37.5 to >31.88 31.88 to >26.25 26.25 to >0 pts 0 pts pts pts BASIC NON_PERFORMANC DISTINGUISHED PROFICIENT Inconsistently Does not Communicates Communicates communicates in communicate in in a manner
that in a manner that a manner that is a manner that is is scholarly, is scholarly, scholarly, scholarly, professional,
andprofessional, andprofessional, andprofessional, and consistent with consistent with consistent with consistent
with expectations for expectations for expectations for expectations for
members of the members of the members of the members of the social work social
work social work social work profession, profession, profession,
or profession. consistently and referencing at does not support with no errors, least
six the claims with referencing at scholarly at least six least six, well- sources. scholarly chosen scholarly sources. sources. |
E / 37.5 pts |
||
|
|
|
|
Total Points: 0 |
|

I agree to the tool's End-User License Agreement (https://api.turnitin.com/api/lti/1p0/user/static_eula) This assignment submission is my own, original work *
![]() |
