đź’¬ Request a Quote, It's FREE!!!

You are a Management Consultant hired by BPP Consultants, who has been commissioned to provide information to a large investment firm, which is considering the following three payment processing companies for investment. For this asses

Assessment Brief

You are a Management Consultant hired by BPP Consultants, who has been commissioned to provide information to a large investment firm, which is considering the following three payment processing companies for investment. For this assessment, you are to select one company from the three listed below to focus on.

  • Master card Incorporated.
  • Paytm (One97CommunicationLimited).
  • Adyen N.V.

The scope of your work is to complete four sections of a report covering Executive Leadership and Corporate Governance.

Please note, you are NOT required to make recommendations or give advice in your report about whether to invest. This will be solely the investor’s decision after evaluating all the information obtained from your report.

Please select only one company from the above three when attempting the tasks below.

You should use the following link to obtain company presentations and reports, but you are encouraged to do your own further research into your chosen company:

The four tasks you should include in your report are:

 

Task1–Leadership and Management

  • Critically evaluate the leadership and management styles at the company using relevant academic models.
  • Conduct independent research into your chosen company and support your arguments with academic literature and the appropriate application of relevant leadership and management models.

 

Task2– Corporate Governance and Regulation

Discuss the different governance rules, practices, and processes (collectively known as the Corporate Governance Framework) at the company that ensure it meets the interests of its shareholders.

Task requirement continue on the next page.


 

Conduct independent research and refer to relevant academic literature.

Ensure that you identify the internal governance mechanisms and the external governance rules and regulations, and demonstrate how the company applies and complies with them to meet shareholder interests. Depending on your company of choice, these might include some of the following:

  • The SEC (U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission), the U.S. Securities and Exchange Act, and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
  • AFM (Dutch Authority for Financial Markets), the 2022 Dutch Corporate Governance Code, and Book 2 of the Dutch Civil Code.
  • SEBI (Securities and Exchange Board of India) and the Listing Agreement of the Indian Stock Exchange.

Please only discuss the governance rules and regulations that are relevant to your organisation of choice.

 

Task3 –Risk Management

 

  • Analyse three significant risks that the company faces and recommend appropriate responses to each of these risks.Conduct independent research into your company of choice and ensure that your analysis and recommendations are specific to the company.For higher marks, use and apply one or more relevant risk management models and frameworks, such as the Three Horizons Model, Risk Heat Maps, or the 4T’s Process. Explain how you used the models to identify and analyse the risks and to offer your recommendations.As part of your recommendations, explain what role the board of directors plays in the risk management process at the organisation.

 

 

Task4 –Ethical Leadership

  • Discuss at least one significant ethical business challenge that the company faces and provide ethical leadership recommendations on how the company can address and manage this ethical challenge.

Conduct independent research and explain why the challenge(s) you discuss is considered ethical, and analyse its impact on the company and its stakeholders. Ensure that your recommendations are targeted at the company’s top management and leadership.

For higher marks, use and apply a relevant ethical leadership model or framework, such as the Triple Bottom Line.

Task requirements continue on the next page.

Presentation and Structure

· Clear structure and layout

· Writing style: professional and concise

· Appropriate Harvard referencing: range and credibility of the sources used and correct application of Harvard referencing style throughout the report and appendices

 

Do NOT include an executive summary, introduction, or conclusion.

 

Your report structure should include the following sections:

  • Cover page (University cover sheet)
  • Table of Contents
  • List of Abbreviations (if appropriate)

 

· Task 1 – Leadership and Management (LO1)

· Task 2 – Corporate Governance and Regulation (LO4)

· Task 3 – Risk Management (LO3)

· Task 4 – Ethical Leadership (LO2)

References Appendix (if appropriate)

 

 

Suggested Word Count Guide

 

Task1-Leadershipand Management1,250 Words
Task2–Corporate Governance and Regulation1,250 Words
Task3–Risk Management1,250 Words
Task4 –Ethical Leadership1,250 Words
Total5,000 Words

 

The word count applies to the main body of the report only, i.e., the cover page, table of contents, list of abbreviations, references, and appendices are NOT part of the 5,000-word count.


 

  1. Marking Guide

 

Learning OutcomeFailMarginal FailPassMeritDistinctionHigh Distinction
0% –39%40%–49%50%–59%60%–69%70%–79%80%- 100%
LO1:Develop yourWeak orLimited knowledge ofSatisfactoryGood level ofExcellent knowledgeOutstanding
Knowledge ofinadequateCritical leadershipKnowledge andKnowledge andAnd understanding ofKnowledge and
Critical leadershipKnowledge ofCapability in leadingUnderstanding ofUnderstanding ofCritical leadershipUnderstanding of
Capability incriticalorganizations. LimitedCritical leadershipCritical leadershipCapability in leadingCritical leadership
leadingleadershipEvaluation of theCapability inCapability in leadingorganisations. AnCapability in leading
organizationsCapability incompany's leadershipleadingorganisations. A goodExcellent criticalorganizations. An
 leadingAnd managementorganisations.Critical evaluation ofEvaluation of theOutstanding critical
 organizations.style. Limited researchSatisfactorythe company'scompany's leadershipEvaluation of the
 Weak or noAnd analysis of theEvaluation of theLeadership andAnd managementcompany's leadership
 Evaluation ofcompany’s leadershipcompany'sManagement style,style, that objectivelyAnd management
 the company'sAnd management.Leadership andWith some discussionWeighs the strengthsstyle, that objectively
 Leadership and managementOf the strengths andAnd weakness of theWeighs all the
 management style. SomeWeakness of thecompany’sStrengths and
 style. Weak or Research andcompany’sLeadership andWeakness of the
 inadequate analysis, of theLeadership andmanagement. Ancompany’s
 Research and company’smanagement. GoodExcellent andLeadership and
 Analysis of the Leadership andApplication ofDetailed applicationmanagement. An
 company’s Management.Relevant leadershipOf relevantOutstanding and
 Leadership and  And managementLeadership andExtensive application
 Management.  Models to theManagement modelsOf relevant
    company. Evidence-To the company.Leadership and
    Backed analysis ofExcellent evidence-Management models
    the company’sBacked analysis ofTo the company.
     the company’sOutstanding and
      Extensive evidence-


 

 

    Leadership and management.Leadership and management.Backed analysis of the company’s leadership and management.
LO4: CriticallyWeak orLimited evaluation ofSatisfactoryGood evaluation ofExcellent evaluationOutstanding
Evaluate theinadequateTheimpact of theEvaluation of theThe impact of theOf the impact of theEvaluation of the
Impact of theEvaluation ofgovernance andImpact of thegovernance andgovernance andImpact of the
Governance andThe impact ofRegulatory context ongovernance andRegulatory context onRegulatory context ongovernance and
Regulatory contextthe governanceThe success of anRegulatory contextThe success of anThe success of anRegulatory context on
On the success ofAnd regulatoryorganization. LimitedOn the success oforganisation. Goodorganisation.The success of an
An organizationContext on theKnowledge of thean organisation.And clearThorough and deeporganisation.
 Success of anCorporate GovernanceSatisfactoryUnderstanding of theKnowledge andThorough, balanced,
 organisation.Frame work at theAppreciation ofCorporateUnderstanding of theAnd deep knowledge
 Weak orcompany. Limitedthe CorporateGovernanceCorporateAnd understanding of
 inadequateExplanation of internalGovernanceFrame work at theGovernancethe Corporate
 Knowledge ofGovernance in theFrame work at thecompany. GoodFrame work at theGovernance
 the CorporateCompany and externalcompany.Explanation ofcompany. ExcellentFrame work at the
 GovernanceGovernance rules andSatisfactoryInternal governanceAnd detailedcompany.
 Frame work atRegulations.Explanation ofIn the company andDiscussion of internalOutstanding and
 the company. internal andExternal governanceGovernance in theExtensive discussion
 Weak or externalRules and regulations.company andOf internal
 inadequate Governance rulesA good discussion onRelevant externalGovernance in the
 Explanation of And regulations.How the companyGovernance rules andcompany and
 internal Some discussionComplies with theseRegulations thatRelevant external
 Governance in On how theRules and regulations.Apply to theGovernance rules and
 the company Company complies company. AnRegulations that
 And external   Excellent discussionApply to the
 governance   On  how the companycompany. An


 

 

 rules and regulations. With these rules and regulations. Complies with these rules and regulations.outstanding and extensive discussion on how the company complies with these rules and regulations.
LO3: CriticallyWeak orLimited appreciationSatisfactoryGood criticalExcellent criticalOutstanding critical
Evaluate riskinadequateOf critical evaluation ofAppreciation ofEvaluation of riskEvaluation o friskEvaluation of risk
Management taxAppreciation ofRisk management ateCritical evaluationManagement taxManagement taxManagement a tax
Corporate levelcriticalCorporate level,Of riskCorporate level. ACorporate level.Corporate level.
 Evaluation ofLimited analysis, andManagement ateGood and clearThorough and deepThorough, balanced,
 riskEvaluation of threeCorporate level.Analysis andKnowledge andAnd deep knowledge
 Management atRisks faced by theSatisfactoryEvaluation of threeUnderstanding of riskAnd understanding of
 a corporatecompany. LimitedAnalysis andSignificant risks facedmanagement. ARisk management. An
 level. Weak orRecommendations forEvaluation ofBy the company.Thorough anOutstanding analysis
 inadequateThe management ofThree risks facedGood andExcellent analysis andAnd evaluation of
 Analysis andThe risk sidentified.By the company.appropriateEvaluation of threeThree significant risks
 Evaluation ofLimited discussion onSatisfactoryrecommendationsSignificant risks facedFaced by the
 Three risks facedThe board’s role inrecommendationsFor the managementBy the company.company.
 By theManaging these risks.For theOf the risks identified.Excellent, realistic,Outstanding,
 company. Weak Management ofA good discussion onAnd appropriaterealistic, and
 or inadequate the risksThe board’s role inrecommendationsinsightful
 recommendation identified. AManaging these risks.For the managementrecommendations
 Ns for the SatisfactorySome application of aOf the risks identified.For the management
 Management of Discussion on therisk managementAn excellentOf the risk identified.
 the risks board’s role inModel or frameworkDiscussion on theAn outstanding
 identified. Weak Managing theseSuch as the Threeboard’s role inDiscussion on the
 Orin adequate risks.Horizon Model orManaging these risks.board’s role i n
 Discussion on  Risk Heat Maps.Excellent and
WhatsApp