You will produce a technical report for the lesson's assignment that includes a high-level solutions diagram for network and remote computing defenses in Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud. This
This assignment will be submitted to Turnitin™
Instructions You will produce a technical report for the lesson's assignment that includes a high-level solutions diagram for network and remote computing defenses in Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud. This will be a minimum of ten pages that contain the specific cloud-native services for the three cloud services, along with a description of their capabilities. You will include why these services were chosen and what risks the services will address. Your high-level diagram must consist of the following items:
Diagram of Google Cloud, AWS, and Azure virtual environment, which must include the following; Web Application Server infrastructure Database Infrastructure Point for user access of your Web Application Point for administrative access to your systems without using the cloud provided console (must have programmatic and remote access) Remote Desktop Environment for employees A detailed description of native network defenses you propose to use for each cloud service provider (AWS, GCP, Azure) What solutions do AWS, Google, and Microsoft provide for SD-WAN and other advanced networking technologies? A discussion about the use-cases these native network defenses will solve Length: 9 -pages, not including title page and references.
References: Include a minimum of five scholarly resources presented in the Course Resources. Identify two additional quality scholarly resources that were not introduced in your required readings yet will enhance understanding when addressing organizational challenges. Your additional resources should be credible and relevant to addressing identified organizational challenges. Be sure to synthesize your resources and use APA standards.
Points: 10 Points
Learning Outcomes and Course Concepts CLO 3: Configure practical network defenses for cloud and remote computing. Course Concept: Networking performance, routing, management, administration, and automation for cloud computing.
GRADE RUBRICS
CriteriaExceeds ExpectationsMeets ExpectationsNeeds ImprovementDeficientNot EvidentCriterion ScoreStudent diagrammed and provided recommendations that demonstrate a clear understanding of remote network management and administration in the cloud? (30%)3 points
Student provided a thorough diagram that accounted for controls in all 3 required cloud providers, a detailed description of native cloud defenses, details about SD-WAN, and use-cases.
Recommendations demonstrated an advanced understanding of remote network management and administration in the cloud.
2.6 points
Student provided a mostly thorough diagram that accounted for controls in 2 of the 3 required cloud providers, a detailed description of native cloud defenses, details about SD-WAN, and use-cases.
Recommendations demonstrated an above average understanding of remote network management and administration in the cloud.
2.3 points
Student provided a somewhat thorough diagram that accounted for controls in 2 of the 3 required cloud providers, but description of native cloud defenses, details about SD-WAN, and use-cases lacked some details.
Recommendations demonstrated an average understanding of remote network management and administration in the cloud.
1.2 points
Student provided a basic diagram that accounted for controls in 2 of the 3 required cloud providers, but description of native cloud defenses, or details about SD-WAN, and use-cases lacked many details.
Recommendations demonstrated a below average understanding of remote network management and administration in the cloud.
0 points
Not attempted or needs major improvement overall.
/ 3Assignment Instructions (20%)2 points
Correctly completed all the assignment instructions.
1.7 points
Correctly completed most of the assignment instructions.
1.5 points
Incorrectly completed some parts of the assignment.
0.8 points
Incorrectly completed most parts of the assignment.
0 points
Not attempted or needs major substantial improvement overall.
/ 2Content and Critical Thinking (20%)2 points
Strong evidence of content knowledge. Responses were thoughtful, thorough, and well-reasoned.
1.7 points
Good evidence of content knowledge. In general, improvement in responses to demonstrate critical thinking is needed.
1.5 points
Some evidence of content knowledge. Some improvement is needed to show adequate understanding of content and the use of critical thinking.
0.8 points
Little evidence of content knowledge. Significant improvement is needed to show adequate understanding of content and the use of critical thinking.
0 points
Not attempted or needs major substantial improvement overall.
/ 2Cohesion & Organization (20%)2 points
Effectively communicates a central idea or point that is present throughout the entirety of the assignment, in a coherent and logical manner. Overall writing is easy to understand.
1.7 points
Communicates a central idea or point that is present through most of the assignment in a coherent manner. Overall writing, for the most part, is easy to understand.
1.5 points
Communicates a central idea or point in the assignment, but may incorporate other unrelated topics. Coherence and organization are somewhat evident.
0.8 points
Communicates several unconnected ideas or points, with no apparent pattern or coherence.
0 points
Does not display a sense of organization or coherence. Non-existent, or lacks clear expression of relevant ideas or points.
/ 2Grammar, Mechanics, Formatting, APA, Integration of Resources (10%)1 point
No misspelled words, grammatical errors, formatting issues, or APA style errors. All resources are scholarly and appropriate for the assignment.
0.9 points
Some misspelled words, grammatical errors, formatting issues, or APA style errors. Most resources are scholarly and appropriate for the assignment.
0.8 points
Many misspelled words, grammatical errors, formatting issues, or APA style errors. Some resources are not scholarly or appropriate for the assignment.
0.4 points
Significant number of misspelled words, grammatical errors, formatting issues, or APA style errors. Most resources are not scholarly or appropriate for the assignment.
0 points
Not attempted or needs major substantial improvement overall.
/ 1
Total/ 10 Overall Score Exceeds Expectations 9 points minimum
Meets Expectations 8 points minimum
Needs Improvement 7.3 points minimum
Deficient 4 points minimum
Not Evident 0 points minimum
